Search for: "P. Jackson" Results 1 - 20 of 1,753
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2024, 8:40 am by David Pozen
In the constitutional sphere, drug reformers have consistently “pulled their punches” (p. 65)—assailing the harms caused by prohibitory drug laws without doing much, if anything, to defend the drugs themselves. [read post]
20 May 2024, 1:00 am by CAFE
Diddy” Combs, Michael Jackson, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, and Martin Shkreli. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  The committee was composed of the director of curriculum, instruction, and educational services; high school principal; junior high school principal; library media specialist; chair of the English department; and a “[p]rocess [c]onsultant. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  The committee was composed of the director of curriculum, instruction, and educational services; high school principal; junior high school principal; library media specialist; chair of the English department; and a “[p]rocess [c]onsultant. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 5:51 am by Albert W. Alschuler
When Justice Amy Coney Barrett noted that, under Trump’s proposed rule, even a president who staged a military coup couldn’t be prosecuted “if there was not a statute that expressly referenced the president,” Trump’s counsel, Sauer, agreed that this traitorous president could escape prosecution (it’s at p. 57 of the transcript). [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 9:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” Only resale would trigger Justice Jackson’s definition of “use. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 9:33 pm by gA
Jackson Women's Health Organization en los Estados Unidos. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 8:20 am by David Reiss
Adler | Adler Stachenfeld David P. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 6:24 am by Eugene Volokh
But it struck me as noteworthy that Justice Jackson was joining this tradition.The post Justice Jackson Seems to Be Charting a More Speech-Restriction-Tolerant Approach appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am by Marty Lederman
    To be sure, as the per curiam opinion notes (p.7), the private respondents “maintain that States may enforce Section 3 against candidates for federal office. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
TRUMP, PETITIONER v.NORMA ANDERSON, ET AL.ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURTOF COLORADO[March 4, 2024]P ER CURIAM . [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 7:40 am
See post, Part I (joint opinion of SOTOMAYOR, KAGAN, and JACKSON, JJ.); see also post, p. 1 (opinion of BARRETT, J.). [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 7:16 am by Rick Hasen
You can find the Supreme Court’s decision, along with separate opinions of Justice Barrett, and Justices Kagan, Sotomayor, and Jackson (together) at this link. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 7:31 am by Rick Hasen
Justice Jackson pointed to some of… Continue reading The post Florida’s Lawyer Having Hard Time at Beginning of Oral Argument in Social Media Cases, Suggesting Law Could Well Be Struck Down [Corrected] appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 7:49 am by Russell Knight
An Illinois domestic violence court can “[p]rohibit respondent from entering or remaining in any residence, household, or premises of the petitioner, including one owned or leased by respondent, if petitioner has a right to occupancy thereof. [read post]