Search for: "P. Vasquez" Results 81 - 94 of 94
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2017, 2:25 pm
Cir. 2008) (`[P]roving the defendant knew the stolen identification belonged to another person should present no major obstacle, as such knowledge will often be demonstrated by the circumstances of the case. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 11:09 pm
Here's a statement in support of Kuehne I received by e-mail: STATEMENT OF JON MAY IN SUPPORT OF BENEDICT P. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 9:16 am by Adam Faderewski
The State Bar of Texas’ Membership Department was informed in November 2021 of the deaths of these members. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 8:28 am by Paul Bland
by Paul Bland, Claire Prestel, and Melanie Hirsch The consumer and civil rights communities are closely watching AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 9:53 am
Richard and Mary Eshelman Faculty Scholar, Professor of Law and International Affairs); (2) Rachel Chambers (University of Connecticut Business School, Assistant Professor of Business Law; Teaching Business and Human Rights Forum, Co-Director); (3) Jeremie Gilbert (University of Roehampton Law School, Professor of Human Rights Law; Roehampton Climate Network, Founding Member); (4) Cannelle Lavite (European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights, Co-Director of Business and Human Rights); (5)… [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 3:20 pm
Vasquez, No. 072796 Conviction for drug and gun offenses is affirmed over claims of error that: 1) the district court should have suppressed his statements acknowledging that the drugs were his, his admission that he possessed the gun and the gun itself; and 2) the evidence was insufficient to show that the gun defendant surrendered at his arrest was carried during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime. . [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
P. 35(b) motion claiming that warden's alleged promise to create an opportunity for a sentence reduction as a reward for his assistance in prison effectively bound the government to file a Rule 35(b) motion on his behalf, judgment denying relief is affirmed where: 1) even if the warden did promise to file a Rule 35(b) motion, a warden within the Bureau of Prisons was unauthorized to make the motion as the "government" under Rule 35(b); and 2) a warden lacks express authority,… [read post]