Search for: "P. v. Bailey" Results 1 - 20 of 217
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2012, 6:39 am by Nicole Mazzocco
The Michigan Supreme Court denied a motion to add an issue in Bailey v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 6:55 am by Layla Kuhl
The Michigan Supreme Court granted defendant-appellee’s motion for an extension to file his brief in People v Bailey. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 9:57 am by Layla Kuhl
On February 3, 2011, the Michigan Supreme Court granted a motion for reconsideration in People v. [read post]
9 Jul 2016, 12:58 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Brian Bailey, No. 112,888 (Johnson)Motion to correct illegal sentence appealCatherine A. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 5:01 am
Matter of McClurkin v Bailey 2010 NY Slip Op 07937 Decided on November 3, 2010 Appellate Division, Second Department The Second Department upheld the family court’s decision, after a hearing, to modify custody to award sole custody of the child to father. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 3:37 am
P. 1.540(b) in that Court Was Without Jurisdiction to Enter the Order, Vacating Same, and Substituting the Within Order in Its Stead. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 6:30 am by Mitra Sharafi
–Table of Contents after the jump.1 Keppell v Bailey (1834); Hill v Tupper (1863) The Numerus Clausus and the Common LawBen McFarlane2 Todrick v Western National Omnibus Co Ltd (1934) The Interpretation of EasementsPeter Butt3 Re Ellenborough Park (1955) A Mere Recreation and AmusementElizabeth Cooke4 Taylors Fashions Ltd v Liverpool Victoria Trustees Co Ltd; Old & Campbell Ltd v Liverpool Victoria Friendly Society (1979)Stitching… [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 11:35 am by Aimee Hess
Continue reading → The post Royalty Interests and Antitrust: Waggoner v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 10:55 am
The case is Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 7:04 am
Mangino, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, on Wednesday, February 8, 2023 Tags: Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, Delaware cases, Delaware Court of Chancery, Delaware law, Fiduciary duties, LP v. [read post]