Search for: "P. v. Betts"
Results 1 - 20
of 32
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2012, 10:03 pm
The Florida Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Wednesday in Betts v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 10:52 am
The court’s decision in Betts Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 8:39 am
Following the opinion in State v. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 1:56 pm
Betts , No. 06-50205(9th Cir. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 3:05 pm
Cenarrusa, 682 P.2d 539, 543 (Idaho 1984). [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 4:02 pm
The Court of Appeal, in reasons for judgment released on June 27, 2013, in Chinn v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 2:17 pm
v=SsvnVoEqHAk For the 2020 MLB season, it was strange from beginning to end. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 5:43 am
Atkins, Camilla P. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 10:55 am
Significantly, Lord Slynn at paragraph 18 of Mohamed (Mohamed v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC (2001) UKHL 57 ) re-considered the approach taken to ‘normal residence’ as discussed in R v Barnet London Borough Council, Ex p Nilish Shah (1983) 2 AC 309, 343, upon which Betts was based, and made clear that “the prima facie meaning of normal residence is a place where at the relevant time the person in fact resides…..and it is not… [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 7:42 am
The case is Salinger v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 7:11 am
Florida and United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:25 am
See also the discussion on this issue by the Australian courts: Betts v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 8:02 am
849 F.2d 460 (9th Cir. 1989) (misappropriation of Bette Midler’s voice) and Waits v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 2:17 pm
p=4820 * Brazil Joins The Madrid Protocol (2019-07-03)https://blog.oppedahl.com/? [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 7:39 pm
In fact, who can forget Chief Justice Roberts' famous edict in the majority opinion in Madonna v. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 9:10 am
., S.A. et al v. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 9:10 am
., S.A. et al v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:52 pm
Betts, No. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 9:47 am
That proposition was effectively trumped by Terry Gallivan, Counsel for Islington, who relied on the contrary proposition in Akinbolu v Hackney LBC (1997) 29 HLR 259, 269 as well as that old chestnut R v Sec of State for the Environment ex p Tower Hamlets LBC [1993] QB 632, 643, neither of which had been cited to Collins J. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 9:47 am
That proposition was effectively trumped by Terry Gallivan, Counsel for Islington, who relied on the contrary proposition in Akinbolu v Hackney LBC (1997) 29 HLR 259, 269 as well as that old chestnut R v Sec of State for the Environment ex p Tower Hamlets LBC [1993] QB 632, 643, neither of which had been cited to Collins J. [read post]
