Search for: "P. v. Booker"
Results 1 - 20
of 119
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2021, 4:30 am
It’s like a movement” (italics added, quoted by Merciera, 2020, p. 188). [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:01 am
A recent decision in the case of Huffman v. [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 12:43 pm
(p. 30)5. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 4:13 pm
Ms Haigh was also championed by Telegraph columnist Christopher Booker in a series of pieces, focusing in particular on her flight to Ireland to give birth to her baby by a subsequent partner, to avoid the anticipated court application for removal at birth. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
In Booker v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 1:50 pm
P’ship v. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 10:53 am
P. 35(f). [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 11:28 am
§ 1396a(p), indicate that Congress clearly and unambiguously intended to create an implied private right of action to challenge a state’s determination that a provider is not “qualified” under the applicable state regulations. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 11:26 am
§ 1396a(p), indicate that Congress clearly and unambiguously intended to create an implied private right of action to challenge a state’s determination that a provider is not “qualified” under the applicable state regulations. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 9:16 am
What do Booker T. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 4:49 am
[v] The Vanishing Criminal Jury Trial at 25-29. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 7:39 am
Here are some of its concluding paragraphs:Unlike in State v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 1:43 pm
p=press_release&id=685Filed under: Environmental Justice [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 1:12 am
Then, as now, he concealed the defendant's name (calling the case "US v. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:12 am
Yates v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 5:24 am
Ct. 2567 (2011), and Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 9:37 am
First, the defense bar had its crack at this issue in Booker. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 4:51 pm
Supreme Court decision, United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 4:51 pm
Supreme Court decision, United States v. [read post]
