Search for: "P. v. Branch" Results 1 - 20 of 996
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Thus, separation of powers is "implied by the separate grants of power to each of the coordinate branches of government" (Bourquin v Cuomo, 85 NY2d 781, 784 [1995] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Thus, separation of powers is "implied by the separate grants of power to each of the coordinate branches of government" (Bourquin v Cuomo, 85 NY2d 781, 784 [1995] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]). [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 11:28 am by rtruman
In Public Trust Doctrine Decision, NJ Supremes Find No Taking of Property in Sand Replenishment Project :: City of Long Branch v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 8:33 am by Rick Hasen
“In addition, experience has shown the difficulty of defining neutral legal principles in this area, for redistricting ordinarily involves criteria and standards that have been weighed and evaluated by the elected branches in the exercise of their political judgment.” —Supreme Court, Perry v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:30 am by Alex Loomis
Yesterday, the Supreme Court decided Ziglar v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:30 am by Alex Loomis
Yesterday, the Supreme Court decided Ziglar v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 2:19 pm by Lawrence Solum
” In this follow-on article, I discuss last Term's decision in FCC v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 9:27 pm by JT
Brownsville Advance Med., P.C. v [...] [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 2:20 pm by JT
Kipor Medicine, P.C. v GEICO, 2010 NY Slip Op 51247(U)(App. [read post]
13 May 2011, 2:47 pm by JT
Matter of Branch v Cole-Lacy, 2011 NY Slip Op 04047 (2d Dept. 2011) This lady who appeared pro se during the morning of an Article 4 support hearing became ill, left a note for the court officer, went to the doctor and failed to appear for the afternoon session of the hearing. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 9:49 am by JT
Balcom v Reither, 2010 NY Slip Op 07701 (2d Dept. 2010) “The plaintiffs contend that the Supreme Court erred in granting those branches of the defendants’ motion which were to strike those portions of the plaintiffs’ expert witness disclosure pertaining to a certain biomedical engineer on the grounds that his testimony will be cumulative of other [...] [read post]
18 Nov 2012, 3:48 pm by JT
Antaki v Mateo, 2012 NY Slip Op 07261 (2d Dept. 2012) “Here, in support of that branch of their cross motion which was for summary judgment, the appellants submitted evidence which included statements by eyewitnesses, verified pursuant to Penal Law § 210.45, which were the equivalent of statements made under oath“ [read post]