Search for: "P. v. Burns" Results 1 - 20 of 492
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2012, 1:49 pm by Julie Lam
Defendant, who allegedly burned a house that was vacant, was charged with the crime of “burning other real property” under MCL 750.73. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
But the High Court has already ruled in a similar case (where protesters chanted “burn in hell”, “baby killers” and “rapists” at British soldiers) that prosecution under the public order act was legitimate, and that freedom of speech will not have been impaired by ““ruling …out” threatening, abusive or insulting speech” (Lord Reid, in Brutus v Cozens [1973] AC 854, at p. 862). [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 3:03 am
P & L Fire Protection Co., 1980 OK 56, 609 P.2d 1289; Fenwick v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 1:31 am by Adam Wagner
Updated | CPS -v- Mohammad Razaul Haque and Emdadur Choudhury – Read judgment A man has  been found guilty of public order offences for burning poppies and chanting “British soldiers burn in hell” on Remembrance Day. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 5:57 am
Bradley King and Krisi Robertson in their official Governmental capacities as Co-directors of the Indiana Election Division, et al. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 4:49 am by Jeff Welty
The latest grant of certiorari is in Heien v. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 2:40 am
Booker, 542 U.S. 220 (2005), an incongruent pattern of caselaw has developed among those federal circuits that have considered whether Burns v. [read post]