Search for: "P. v. French"
Results 1 - 20
of 745
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2014, 12:49 pm
The agreements between collecting societies and some content sharing platforms do not, as of now, secure these practices " (Part. 1 p. 36).French Law “Awkward” at Grasping Transformative WorksAs explained by the Report, the term “transformative” originated in U.S. fair use case law, particularly the Supreme Court Campbell v. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 2:39 am
On 24 November 2010, the Tribunal de Grande Instance de Paris gave judgment in the case of Omar S v Alexandre P. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 7:20 am
Ghassemi v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 7:23 am
This mandate, called legal deposit (dépôt légal in French), is still in effect under articles L131-1 and L131-2 of the Code du Patrimoine (Cultural Heritage Code). [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 2:22 am
P. 461 note Bruguière ; RTDCom. 2008 p. 300 obs. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 9:50 am
P. 44.1. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 9:45 am
Thus, false representations around a firm’s own, or it’s competitor’s, products can be legally actionable, as the Supreme Court again ruled this year in a case about beverage labeling (Pom Wonderful v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 8:44 am
” Resolution 1165 was quoted by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in the 1994 Von Hannover v. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 4:34 pm
French et al v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 2:09 pm
France and Huvig v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 2:09 pm
France and Huvig v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 2:09 pm
France and Huvig v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 2:09 pm
France and Huvig v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 1:05 pm
” (citing French v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 1:00 am
Data is not available for 2020 and 2021. [11] Section 218 of the Act. [12] Wilkinson v Kitzinger (No 2) [2007] 1 FLR 295, per Sir Mark Potter P at [50]. [13] See paragraph 21(2)(d) of Schedule 5; paragraph 5(2)(d) of Schedule 6; and paragraph 10(3)(a) of Schedule 7. [14] GW v RW (Financial Provision: Departure from Equality) [2003] 2 FLR 108; IX v IY [2018] EWHC 3053 per Williams J at [68]; MB v EB [2019] EWHC 1649. [15] Levin, I. (2004). [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 3:47 am
Ett av dem omhandler spionasje.Av dommen går det frem at Moland og French anses for å være norske spioner, og påstanden om at de to fortsatt er ansatt i Forsvaret ble gjentatt.- Vi har tatt klar avstand fra punktene om spionasje, og dette er blitt formidlet til kongolesiske myndigheter. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 2:57 am
Bodum USA, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 7:14 am
Consequently, even though the sums involved in the measure at issue were not held permanently by the public authorities, the fact that they remained constantly under public control, and therefore available to the competent national authorities, was sufficient for them to be categorised as State resources (see, to that effect, Case C‑83/98 P France v Ladbroke Racing and Commission [2000] ). [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 1:32 pm
R. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 6:37 am
(The decision is available here in French, with a link to a Google Translate English version.) [read post]
