Search for: "P. v. Germany"
Results 1 - 20
of 572
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2019, 7:54 am
Germany, Jr. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 11:42 pm
United Kingdom, ECHR-Reports 2001-XI, p. 101, Kalegoropoulou v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 9:02 am
Towfigh: Politics as Markets in Germany appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 5:01 am
Germany Shala & Another v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 3:30 am
Isabel V. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 5:16 am
In Muhlemkamp v Blizzard, 521 F Supp 2d 1140 (E.D. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 4:13 pm
In the case of Bild GmbH v Germany [2023] ECHR 851 the Fourth Section of the European Court of Human Rights found that an order that a publisher should cease publication of CCTV footage of an arrest without pixelating the face of one of the officers involved was a violation of Article 10 as it could lead to an unacceptable ban on future publication on matters of public interest. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 7:00 am
(Bates v. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 9:51 am
Beteiligungs KG v. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 7:11 am
More from our authors: Concise European Copyright Law Second Edition by Thomas Dreier, P. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:38 am
Germany; Von Hannover v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:24 pm
Radu v. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 3:47 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 5:36 pm
(Racial Profiling in Germany )The excellent symposium essays seek to translate the practices at issue in Basu v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 1:21 am
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Stuttgart (Germany), to be dealt with through the accelerated procedure, was lodged on 16 June 2010 in case C- 296/10 (Bianca Purrucker v Guillermo Vallés Pérez, noch ein mal). [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 5:20 pm
The earlier article by v. [read post]
1 Jun 2013, 1:16 am
Damon V. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 4:22 am
Said Coty, since Stepan P was infringing in Germany, thanks to the assistance of First Note, that business was also responsible for the constitutive element of the infringement. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 1:43 pm
The Court held that that the procedure established under Art. 259 TFEU was designed to obtain a declaration that the conduct of a Member State was in breach of EU law and to terminate that conduct (see, to that effect, Joined Cases 15/76 and 16/76 France v Commission [1979]; Case C-456/05 Commission v Germany [2007]; and Joined Cases C-514/07 P, C-528/07 P and C-532/07 P Sweden and Others v API and Commission [2010]).Thus, as the aim of… [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:09 pm
[Germany][Petitioners motion to dismiss granted] In Krause v Krause 2023 WL 2541912 (E.D. [read post]
