Search for: "P. v. Heard" Results 21 - 40 of 2,357
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2024, 12:10 am by Josh Richman
Ron Wyden and former Congressman Chris Cox in Gonzalez v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
(See Reader's Digest, supra, 37 Cal.3d at p. 257 [recklessness "may be found where there are obvious reasons to doubt the veracity of the informant or the accuracy of his reports"]; Grewal v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 12:50 am by CMS
Permission to appeal to the Supreme Court was granted in the autumn of 2022, and the case was heard over 2 days in October 2023. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm by Josh Blackman
[The issues, arguments, and evidence raised by Mikhail have already been addressed by extant scholarship, including our scholarship. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 4:24 am by Alessandro Cerri
 Further, the Court stated that it is an established principle of settled case-law that, as a general rule, the submission of facts and evidence by the parties remains possible after the expiry of the relevant time limits, and the EUIPO is not prohibited from taking account of such facts and evidence (mobile.de v EUIPO, C‑418/16 P).In this case, it was accepted by both parties that Mr Noah had submitted the first evidence of use of the Mark within the time limit set by… [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 11:37 am by Josh Blackman
Tillman and I made that point expressly in our brief at p. 5. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm by Amy Howe
ShareThe Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Thursday in what is shaping up to be the biggest election case since its ruling nearly 25 years ago in Bush v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:07 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Mehta and Kaitlyn Box have thoughts: "The Supreme Court on January 17, 2024 heard arguments in two cases – R elentless, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
”[10]  The June 1, 1972 Report of the Advisory Committee on Enforcement Policies and Practices—now commonly referred to as the Wells Report—included a lengthy discussion about the settlement of Commission enforcement actions, and made several recommendations related to the settlement process.[11]  The Commission had decades of experience settling cases, through both settlements on a no-admit/no-deny basis and settlements allowing defendants to deny wrongdoing.[12]… [read post]