Search for: "P. v. Jones"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,178
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2022, 9:30 pm
The New Haven Roots of Roe v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
I often quote what I call “Roche’s dictum,” which I heard John P. [read post]
15 May 2022, 12:25 am
Scotland, religious harassment and football The claimant in Mr P McCue v Civil Nuclear Police Authority [2022] UKET 2415411/2021 was a Roman Catholic police sergeant based at Hunterston B nuclear power station. [read post]
12 May 2022, 2:17 am
See generally Lili Levi, ‘The Problem of Trans-National Libel’ (2012) 60 American Journal of Comparative Law 507. [4] Dow Jones & Co Inc v Gutnick (2002) 210 CLR 575. [5] But see Michael Douglas, ‘Characterisation of Breach of Confidence as a Privacy Tort in Private International Law’ (2018) 41 UNSW Law Journal 490. [6] Art 4(1); see Andrew Dickinson, The [read post]
4 May 2022, 5:01 am
The prisoner was William P. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm
” Jones’ article for the Guardian can be read here and a follow up article here. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 3:00 am
” Jones v. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
The second edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence contained a chapter by the late Professor Margaret Berger, who took pains to point out the difference between agency assessments and the adjudication of causal claims in court: [p]roof of risk and proof of causation entail somewhat different questions because risk assessment frequently calls for a cost-benefit analysis. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 9:14 am
Nov. 21, 2021)Jones v. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 6:00 pm
Mark P. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 2:03 pm
Bohne (1955) 130 Cal.App.2d 553, 554‒557 [plaintiff’s daughter took advantage of her physical and mental illness by tricking her into signing a deed]; Jones v. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
Hurn v. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 5:52 am
” Patrick Media Group Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 10:52 pm
By contrast, courts in California and Canada have found a contractual jurisdiction and applicable law clause invalid as a matter of public policy in order to allow a class action privacy claim to proceed against Facebook.[6] In England, the dual challenge of jurisdiction and collective actions in a mass privacy infringement claim has presented itself before the English Courts, first in Vidal-Hall v Google before the Court of Appeal in 2015[7] and in the Supreme Court judgment of Google… [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
(Motion Opinion , p. 30). [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:32 am
On 7 and December 2021 the UK Supreme Court (Lords Reed, Lloyd-Jones, Kitchin, Sales and Leggatt) heard the appeal in the case of Fearn v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery, a two-day appeal concerning neighbourhood privacy rights from the decision of the Court of Appeal ([2020] EWCA Civ 104). [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 11:24 am
Turning first to the request by petitioners to proceed with this matter as a class action (CPLR 901), we note that when governmental operations are involved, and when subsequent petitioners will be adequately protected under the principles of stare decisis, class actions are inappropriate (Matter of Jones v Berman, 37 N.Y.2d 42). [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 11:24 am
Turning first to the request by petitioners to proceed with this matter as a class action (CPLR 901), we note that when governmental operations are involved, and when subsequent petitioners will be adequately protected under the principles of stare decisis, class actions are inappropriate (Matter of Jones v Berman, 37 N.Y.2d 42). [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 6:34 am
Reserved Judgments Associated Newspapers Limited v Duchess of Sussex, heard 9-11 November 2021 (The Master of the Rolls, The President of the Queen’s Bench Division and Bean LJ) GUH v KYT, heard on 28 October 2021 (Collins Rice J) Soriano v Forensic News, heard 6 and 7 October 2021 (Sharp P, Elisabeth Laing and Warby LJ) Qatar Airways Group Q.S.C.S v Middle East News UK Limited and others heard on 4 October 2021 (Saini J) Abramovich… [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 6:38 am
Indest, at p. 267. [read post]
