Search for: "P. v. Kelly" Results 81 - 100 of 620
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2017, 11:52 am
Chilton, reviewing The Continent of International Law: Explaining Agreement Design, by Barbara Koremenos Patrick Kelly, reviewing Customary International Law in Times of Fundamental Change: Recognizing Grotian Moments, by Michael P. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 10:42 am by Aaron Lindstrom
 Chief Justice Kelly would have denied leave to appeal. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 2:04 pm by Nicole Mazzocco
Chief Justice Kelly dissented, joined by Justices Cavanagh and Hathaway. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 5:11 pm
On Friday, September 11, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court granted, in part, the defendant’s motion for rehearing in People v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 8:44 am
On July 31, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court issued its opinion in People v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 10:59 am by Nicole Mazzocco
Justice Cavanagh concurred, joined by Chief Justice Kelly. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 12:16 pm by Julie Lam
 Justice Marilyn Kelly would remand the case for a hearing pursuant to People v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 7:43 am
The Court referred to Goglio v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 9:05 am
Yesterday, the Michigan Supreme Court heard oral argument in Kyser v. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 10:44 am
”     The Chief Justice of the Texas Court of Appeals cited it in a concurring opinion in Kelly v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 7:16 am by Layla Kuhl
In People v Gregg, Justice Kelly dissented from the denial of the application stating that she would vacate the defendant’s sentence because the trial court erroneously punished defendant for exercising his constitutional and statutory rights by assessing 10 points for OV 19 (interference with the administration of justice). [read post]
8 May 2009, 11:56 am by Liskow & Lewis
For more information on the proposed legislation, see www.nola.com/business/t-p/index.ssf/base/money-2   [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 1:26 pm by Matthew Nelson
On December 29, 2010, the Michigan Supreme Court issued a split decision in Anglers of the AuSable, Inc. v. [read post]