Search for: "P. v. Neal" Results 1 - 20 of 164
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2009, 1:39 pm
On September 30, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court granted leave to appeal in O'Neal v. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 7:44 am by Spencer Overton
  The brief is here, and a summary of… Continue reading The post Election Officials file amicus in Murthy v. [read post]
13 Jun 2015, 11:16 pm by Orly Lobel
Neal Kumar Katyal and Thomas Schmidt just published an article in the Harvard Law Review criticizing the Roberts Court for, among other things, using the constitutional avoidance canon to articulate new constitutional norms, a use of the canon that they call “generative avoidance” (p. 2112). [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:00 am by Kristina Araya
In Fisher Sand and Gravel Co v Neal A Sweebe, Inc, No. 297156, Judge Owens authored the majority opinion in this case of first impression, holding that the plaintiff’s claim for payment on an open account relating to the sale of goods was barred by the four year limitations period in the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 11:39 am by admin
Acting Solicitor General Neal Katryal filed an amicus brief in the case of i4i v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 8:25 am by Charles Sartain
Posted by Charles SartainCo-author Andrew Neal Non-operators have had a lot in common with Br’er Rabbit ever since 2006, when the Texas Supreme Court surprised the industry in Seagull Energy E & P, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 8:03 am by Fabrizio di Piazza
 Katyal has argued twenty-four cases before the Court, including his first case, Hamdan v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 8:07 am by Fabrizio di Piazza
 Katyal has argued twenty-four cases before the Court, including his first case, Hamdan v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 7:58 am by Fabrizio di Piazza
 Katyal has argued twenty-four cases before the Court, including his first case, Hamdan v. [read post]
22 Aug 2015, 8:20 am by Fabrizio di Piazza
 Katyal has argued twenty-four cases before the Court, including his first case, Hamdan v. [read post]