Search for: "P. v. Parodi" Results 1 - 20 of 167
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am by centerforartlaw
Through a blend of parody, fair use, and keen societal commentary, MSCHF, a collective known for its provocative and often controversial projects, has carved out a unique space in the art world, sparking discussions on the limits of creativity, ownership, and free speech.[2] In the realm of appropriation art, artists remix, repurpose, and reimagine existing works to create something new. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 3:47 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Start w/question of strict liability v. blanket immunity; look at possible regimes; map out core elements of 512, DSA, and 230. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:09 pm by Eugene Volokh
A statement that a reasonable reader would recognize is parody, for instance, wouldn't be actionable even if some readers might miss the joke. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
As Justice Souter wrote for a unanimous Supreme Court in Campbell v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 12:29 pm
Parody is a murkier claim since what one person finds a humorous spoof may offend another or dilute the trademark value via ridicule. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 1:36 am by Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot
 Henry P Yang wondered if the Court of Appeal has signalled the end of English judicial influence of Arrow declarations through its decision in Teva v Novartis. [read post]