Search for: "P. v. Parodi"
Results 41 - 60
of 167
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2013, 5:14 am
Hart v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 5:33 am
The defendant raised the defences of freedom of artistic expression, as well as parody, both of which were however rejected by the court.Eleonora also provided us with A Kat's 2019 Copyright Awards, which included the most important copyright decision, copyright person of the year, and the most important policy issue for 2020 (no spoilers here - go read it for yourself!) [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 2:08 pm
” Well, yesterday the court indeed rejected the lieutenant governor’s request for a preliminary injunction; see Dardenne v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 7:02 am
” Bruce P. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 7:01 pm
In a case arising in Western Pennsylvania, Prowel v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 1:47 am
Rule of Reason curbs Basic Instinct as trade mark loses its appealCase C-400/14 P Basic AG Lebensmittelhandel v OHIM), Repsol YPF SA intervening see the Court of Justice of the European Union dealing with the conflict of two figurative marks containing the word "basic". [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 8:40 pm
Menell & Robert P. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 1:14 pm
He submitted that current interpretation of fair use, eg Cariou v Prince, is different from what fair use used to be, say, 20 years ago] should be imported into these laws - as well as different approaches that have arisen in the course of these processes. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 3:39 am
Bryant, Jr. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 5:10 pm
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of JWR Productions Australia Pty Ltd v Duncan-Watt (No 2) [2020] FCA 236 Thawley J dismissed two libel claims concerning a Golden Girls parody puppet show. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 4:00 am
The defendant in U.S. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 2:29 pm
Viacom v Gootube is on. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 3:35 pm
The full decision can be read at: Decision [1]Salinger v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 11:45 pm
– Hollywood Reporter www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/who-has-right-parody-keanu-190657 The case is Keeling v. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 10:53 am
Morgan Prewett is a 30-page opinion, including a concurring opinion beginning on p. 23. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 2:32 am
The second scenario is where both rights fall within the hands of the same owner, as in Case C-377/05 Christian Dior v Evora. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 7:42 am
The case is Salinger v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 6:40 am
Grant, 108 P.3d 768 (Washington Supreme Court 2005). [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 11:57 am
P and M took the materials to the police. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 2:59 pm
., Lockheed Martin Corp. v. [read post]
