Search for: "P. v. Pettie"
Results 1 - 20
of 104
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2017, 1:40 pm
S.C., March 27, 2017, P. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 12:08 pm
(Ashley, supra, 42 Cal.2d at p. 258; see People v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 1:20 pm
In People v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 5:15 am
" P. 61. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 2:46 pm
” (Id. at p. 458.). [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 10:49 pm
Entertainment Law Offices of Gordon P. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 2:14 pm
Holm, supra, 3 Cal.App.5th at p. 147; People v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 1:06 pm
(See People v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 7:59 am
With an unsurprising take: Rowling seeks to stop ‘The Harry Potter Lexicon’ from being published (pdf) Now that the petty wrangling, emotional outbursts and mind-numbing duels over Latin words roots have ended, the federal judge in this week’s Harry Potter trial faces a daunting task: How do you balance an author’s right to protect her copyrighted novels with a publisher’s right to produce a new book that borrows heavily from these… [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 5:00 am
Petty could show falsehood in the portrayal of being pro-choice and supporting Roe v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 10:41 am
The Court relied on Atwater v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:24 am
Holm, supra, 3 Cal.App.5th at p. 147; People v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 9:45 am
En Pharrell Williams et al v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 6:22 am
(Noyan, at p. 672.)People v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 6:02 am
From Gaymon v. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 5:02 am
But saying "The indictment said that P stole money from petty cash," but omitting P's acquittal, is no longer a "full and fair" report, precisely because it omits an important fact. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 2:46 pm
Then came Oregon v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 11:33 am
Kirkpatrick Pettis Smith Polian, Inc., 996 P.2d 771 (Colo. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 4:00 am
Coverdale, Michael V. [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 3:02 am
(quoting Temporary Commission on Revision of the Penal Law and Criminal Code, Proposed Penal Law, p. 330). [read post]