Search for: "P. v. Potter"
Results 1 - 20
of 153
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2009, 10:05 am
On July 31, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court released its opinion in Potter v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 7:51 pm
As you know, the First first heard this case in Gómez-Pérez v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:04 pm
As former Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart observed, "'[P]roperty does not have rights, only people do.'" (p. 254 [attorney Scott Bullock quoting Potter Stewart].)In other words, with eminent domain, it's about people, not property.Jeff Benedict's Little Pink House especially reveals and revels in the human drama surrounding the Kelo v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 2:40 pm
The trial will be open to the public, and will be conducted before the Honorable Robert P. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 7:59 am
With an unsurprising take: Rowling seeks to stop ‘The Harry Potter Lexicon’ from being published (pdf) Now that the petty wrangling, emotional outbursts and mind-numbing duels over Latin words roots have ended, the federal judge in this week’s Harry Potter trial faces a daunting task: How do you balance an author’s right to protect her copyrighted novels with a publisher’s right to produce a new book that borrows heavily from… [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 9:26 am
Entertainment Inc. et al v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 12:38 pm
Recuerde – lesiónado llame a DLP; o pídale a su abogado local si consideraria referirlo a nuestra firma. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 3:25 am
In Potter’s Shopping Center, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 7:07 am
Shabahang, 484 Mich. 156 (2009) and Potter v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 10:55 pm
Sys. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 11:15 am
P. 66.3(e).Here's the underlying, unpublished, memorandum opinion here. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 10:17 am
About half way through that term, the employer decided that it didn’t want to Potter v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 7:48 am
It is nearly six years since Sir Mark Potter P issued Practice Direction: Court Bundles (Universal Practice to be Applied in all Courts other than the Family Proceedings Court) [2006] 2 FLR 199 (now in Practice Direction 27A Family Procedure Rules 2010). [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 4:00 am
Potter v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 7:56 am
Based on his opinion yesterday in United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 12:47 am
Shabahang, 484 Mich 156 (2009), and Potter v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 8:29 am
This appears for example at paragraph 67 of the judgment of Sir Mark Potter P in Charman v Charman [2007] 1 FLR 1246 (Charman (No 4)) where he says:“… the starting point of every inquiry in an application of ancillary relief is the financial position of the parties. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 7:22 am
there are two routes that a plaintiff can follow to establish constructive dismissal, as set out in Potter v. [read post]
12 Jan 2008, 9:21 am
" Opinion, p.14 (quoting, Smith v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 4:00 am
Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., 863 P.2d 795 (Cal. 1993). [read post]
