Search for: "P. v. Valencia" Results 1 - 20 of 73
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2017, 1:04 pm
(Cal.S.C., July 3, 2017, P. v. [read post]
26 May 2013, 5:33 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
John’s Law Review , Vol. 69, p. 69, 1995, UNM School of Law Research Paper Gloria Valencia-Weber and Christine Zuni Cruz University of New Mexico – School of Law and University of New Mexico – School of Law Date Posted: May 17, 2013 Three Stories in One: The Story of Santa Clara Pueblo v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Valencia Holding Corp., ___ Cal.App.3d ___ (Nov. 23, 2011) (Second Appellate District, Division One). [read post]
14 May 2009, 11:16 am
La historia recoge ciertos datos al respecto ocurridos en tiempos de Aníbal y la segunda guerra púnica. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 2:43 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Secretary of State for the Home Department v Pankina [2010] EWCA Civ 719 (23 June 2010) Khader v Aziz & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 716 (23 June 2010) Annulment Funding Company Ltd v Cowey & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 711 (23 June 2010) Sugar v The British Broadcasting Commission & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 715 (23 June 2010) AET Inc Ltd v Arcadia Petroleum Ltd “Eagle Valencia” [2010] EWCA Civ 713 (23 June… [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am by Mary Whisner
Martinez, by Gloria Valencia-WeberChallenging the Narrative of Conquest: The Story of Lyng v. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 8:38 am by Juliette Passer, Esq.
Ricardo Martinelli easily wins candidacy for deputy in the circuit 8-8Former President Ricardo Martinelli was the most voted candidate in the 8-8 circuit, with 2,548 votes, of 5,870 voters who exercised their right yesterday.Ricardo Martinelli was victorious in the Democratic Change (CD) primary to choose candidates for deputies.The former president won 44.17% (2,548 votes) in the 8-8 circuit, in which 5,870 voters participated.In addition to Martinelli, Miguel Gallardo, with 16.1% (930 votes), and… [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 5:59 am by lopeznoriega
Acudió a la vía de amparo alegando vulnerado su derecho a la integridad física y moral y a lo que denomina intimidad domiciliaria. [read post]