Search for: "P. v. Vines"
Results 1 - 20
of 68
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Boyer-Vine (E.D. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:02 am
P. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 8:30 pm
Boyer-Vine, 237 F. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 1:11 am
Bittner (OUP, 2021, 272 p.). [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:24 am
Therefore, all products with FDA clearance / approval or designated 361 HCT/P exemption used in accordance with that product’s individualized application guidelines will be equally considered for the purpose of this LCD and may be considered reasonable and necessary. [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 6:01 am
Michael P. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am
The Application was refused, with Lord Summers relying on R v Legal Aid Board ex p. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:01 am
A, as well as Nurse D., Therapist I., Technologist P., and Physician Liaison X? [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 4:12 pm
On 5 October 2021, Nicklin J heard the trial of a preliminary issue in the case of Vine v Belfield. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 3:22 am
P. 65(d)(2)(C). [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 11:58 am
INC. 6438535 FIRMPRO 6437775 ACCUNET 6443284 ELITE CAGE JITSU 6443283 ELITE FIGHT NIGHT 6437677 NXG 6442926 STUDIO3INDY 6442912 VANLINKD 6437357 LAGHINI 6443252 DIPLOMATE OF MEDICAL CANNABINOID SCIENCE 6437283 A’DEVE 6442720 AI 6464646 COMPETECARE 6458835 PUTTING THE REAL IN REAL ESTATE 6464588 SEEDFIELDCHECK 6465426 TRAINERHUB 6458802 SPRINGBUK HEALTH INTELLIGENCE 6464547 AIRSTREAM FINANCIAL 6458746 SOUNDSPACE 6458742 SOUNDSPACE 6458726 CX FLEX 6458694 ANTIQUE CANDLE CO. 6458680 ES2 6458629… [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 5:01 am
Indeed, in People v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 5:03 am
P. 10(a); see Doe v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 8:19 am
Whitehurst Family P’ship, 954 So. 2d 1278, 1278 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (same). [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 8:19 am
Whitehurst Family P’ship, 954 So. 2d 1278, 1278 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (same). [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 8:19 am
Whitehurst Family P’ship, 954 So. 2d 1278, 1278 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (same). [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 6:00 am
In Vine, et al. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 7:59 am
Furthermore, the CPVO has a broad discretion to declare a plant variety right null and void under Article 20 of the Basic Regulation, which it exercises on the basis of the evidence submitted to it by the applicant for a declaration of nullity (see Brookfield New Zealand and Elaris v CPVO and Schniga C-534/10 P). [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
In Vine v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 1:01 am
Ron Chernow, Grant, p. 831) The new 1877 Act also provided that “whenever schools shall have been provided by the Government for said Indians [mostly boarding schools off reservation and having the intent to strip the children of their culture], no rations shall be issued for children between the ages of six and fourteen years (the sick and infirm excepted) unless such children shall regularly attend school. [read post]
