Search for: "P. v. Waters" Results 1 - 20 of 1,519
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2024, 8:07 am by John Timmer
The rules came in response to a Supreme Court decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 10:32 am
A crítica pós-moderna descartava qualquer abordagem “essencialista” e, junto com ela, pretendia desconstruir o que lhes parecia ser a pedra de toque do Modernismo: a mística do instantâneo fotográfico. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 8:29 am by Dennis Crouch
[P]etitioner claims that the Grebe-Sanford process has filled a long felt want and has been a commercial success. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 12:05 am by Josh Richman
Clearview AI, a 2020 lawsuit alleging violation of Illinois residents’ privacy rights under the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act  EFF’s amicus brief in ACLU v. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 6:50 pm
While no amount of money can fully compensate a person for damage to their health or their developmental potential, these damage awards should improve the victims’ quality of life.More broadly, Peru was ordered to strengthen and strictly enforce environmental standards, rehabilitate damaged ecosystems, monitor air, water and soil quality, ensure that polluters pay for the environmental damage they cause. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am by centerforartlaw
The shoes were filled with holy water sourced from the Jordan River and adorned with religious symbols, including a miniature crucifix and the inscription “MT. 14:25,” referencing the biblical passage describing Jesus walking on water.[20] Despite not being endorsed or made by Nike, the Jesus Shoes gained popularity and were worn by celebrities like Drake. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:10 am by Josh Richman
Ron Wyden and former Congressman Chris Cox in Gonzalez v. [read post]
  We underscore that all hostages must be treated humanely with access to food, water and medical care at a minimum pending their release. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 6:15 am by Bob Ambrogi
By now, in the wake of several cases in which lawyers have found themselves in hot water by citing hallucinated cases generated by ChatGPT, most notoriously Mata v. [read post]