Search for: "PA FILE AND SERVE" Results 81 - 100 of 1,312
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2023, 5:00 am
According to the Opinion, the Plaintiff filed a Complaint but did not serve it for five (5) years. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 9:48 am
View the article here12/04/2007A Montgomery County judge intends to dismiss the latest appeal filed by a former police officer convicted of trying to set up a sexual liaison with an underage girl.Judge Steven T. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 5:00 am
The Defendant doctor at issue filed Preliminary Objections asserting that he was not properly served until approximately 9 ½ months after the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  In this matter, in an attempt to explain its failure to file a responsive pleading to the Complaint, the Defendant asserted that it was not properly served. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
 These venue rules served to lower the number of medical malpractice cases filed in the liberal jurisdiction of Philadelphia by preventing filings there unless the cause of action arose in Philadelphia. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 7:57 am by Phil Coulson
The decision reversed a trial court’s ruling that Section 302(e) of PA’s Eminent Domain Code gave PennDOT a year to file a declaration of taking after first authorizing a project. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 7:57 am by David Snyder
The decision reversed a trial court’s ruling that Section 302(e) of PA’s Eminent Domain Code gave PennDOT a year to file a declaration of taking after first authorizing a project. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 8:41 am by Glenn Neiman
This document was to serve as an estimate of the jobs which exist in the geographic area in which the injured worker resides. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 7:16 pm by Jeralyn
The federal judge rejected the plea agreements and new Indictments with a slew of more charges were filed. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
The Defendant-sister filed Preliminary Objections asserting that a party cannot substitute a different party as the Plaintiff under Pa. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 8:38 pm
Defendant Allgyer was served with the complaint earlier today. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 12:14 pm by Mark Ashton
  Pennsylvania parties served with such a subpoena must file for a Protective Order under Rule 4012 if they wish to oppose the request discovery. [read post]
29 May 2016, 7:42 pm by Patricia Salkin
Nextel Communications of the Mid-Atlantic, Inc. v Zoning Hearing Board of Ross Township, 2016 WL 1271385 (MD PA 3/31/2016)  Filed under: Current Caselaw, Wireless Communications [read post]