Search for: "PASSARELLA v. PASSARELLA" Results 1 - 20 of 43
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2010, 4:55 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Here's a link to a September 21, 2010 Pennsylvania Law Weekly article by reporter Gina Passarella about the reaction of the bar across Pennsylvania to the recent Superior Court case of first impression decision in the case of Barrick v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 5:07 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Adopts Rule Banning Attorney-Expert Discovery" by Gina Passarella who called for a comment on the issue.The article provides more analysis on the amendments to Rule 4003.5 on the parameters of permissible expert discovery and confirming that there is a split amongst the members of the bar in favor of, and against, the new Rule. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 3:27 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Gina Passarella of the Legal Intelligenser reports on a case from Philadelphia that illustrates the difference between Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Legal Malpractice involving  Cravath, Swaine & Moore. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 1:53 am
Bukowski of Stevens & Lee, were just doing their job as they represented Capital Blue Cross in Grider v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 12:46 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
According to a May 17, 2011 article by Gina Passarella of the Pennsylvania Law Weekly, Judge Albert J. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
" The judge also noted that the doctor who performed the surgeries was certainly a specialist in the field and the plaintiffs could have called him to testify about the need for the surgeries.Copies of Lee v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
As also already reported in The Legal Intelligencer in a July 9, 2015 article by Gina Passarella, in a recent July 8, 2015 detailed Order, the Eastern Federal District Court of Pennsylvania remanded a removed Post-Koken case back to Delaware County in the matter of Kennedy v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 3:37 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
In a case of semantics, the Pennsylvania Superior Court recently ruled in the case of Nationwide v. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 8:00 am by Aaron Weems
  Since then she’s been refused certain spousal benefits and is required to pay inheritance taxes on Underwood’s estate; issues which, ironically, are nearly identical to those raised by Edith Winsor in the seminal same-sex marriage case, United States v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:31 am by Daniel E. Cummins
According to a May 23, 2011 article by Gina Passarella of the Legal Intelligencer, the seminal Jefferson County social media decision in the case of McMillen v. [read post]