Search for: "PAUL E. CAIN"
Results 1 - 20
of 29
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
But I also did not expect to be compared to both Don Quixote and a milquetoast version of Paul Revere who wants to develop a plan to fight the British in 50 years. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 8:47 am
To get there one must confront identity, and the objectivity of the self-E. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 12:23 pm
Cain Jr., 90, of Canton, Michigan, died January 11, 2021. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
• William E. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
• William E. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 5:53 am
Cain, and Kathleen C. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
Julie E. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
Samsung: Adverse Inference Redux for Samsung’s E-Mail Practices - http://bit.ly/OV4G2D (Cynthia Courtney) Samsung Takes On Apple Over Value Of Phone Features - http://bit.ly/PiCN5d (Dan Levine) Northern District of California Issues Adverse Inference Instruction for Inadequate Preservation – http://bit.ly/MSH3MB (Reed Smith) Apple Catches Samsung Trying To Pull A Couple Fast Ones – Apple 2.0 - http://bit.ly/MUjhzQ (Philip Elmer-DeWitt)… [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
Samsung: Adverse Inference Redux for Samsung’s E-Mail Practices - http://bit.ly/OV4G2D (Cynthia Courtney) Samsung Takes On Apple Over Value Of Phone Features - http://bit.ly/PiCN5d (Dan Levine) Northern District of California Issues Adverse Inference Instruction for Inadequate Preservation – http://bit.ly/MSH3MB (Reed Smith) Apple Catches Samsung Trying To Pull A Couple Fast Ones – Apple 2.0 - http://bit.ly/MUjhzQ (Philip Elmer-DeWitt)… [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
Samsung: Adverse Inference Redux for Samsung’s E-Mail Practices - http://bit.ly/OV4G2D (Cynthia Courtney) Samsung Takes On Apple Over Value Of Phone Features - http://bit.ly/PiCN5d (Dan Levine) Northern District of California Issues Adverse Inference Instruction for Inadequate Preservation – http://bit.ly/MSH3MB (Reed Smith) Apple Catches Samsung Trying To Pull A Couple Fast Ones – Apple 2.0 - http://bit.ly/MUjhzQ (Philip Elmer-DeWitt)… [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
Samsung: Adverse Inference Redux for Samsung’s E-Mail Practices - http://bit.ly/OV4G2D (Cynthia Courtney) Samsung Takes On Apple Over Value Of Phone Features - http://bit.ly/PiCN5d (Dan Levine) Northern District of California Issues Adverse Inference Instruction for Inadequate Preservation – http://bit.ly/MSH3MB (Reed Smith) Apple Catches Samsung Trying To Pull A Couple Fast Ones – Apple 2.0 - http://bit.ly/MUjhzQ (Philip Elmer-DeWitt)… [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
Law School Gender Faculty Member Blog Akron M William Huhn Will Huhn Akron M Stefan Padfield The Race to the Bottom Alabama M Paul Horwitz Prawfsblawg Albany M Keith Hirokawa Environmental Law Prof Blog Albany F Patricia E. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 6:13 am
- http://nyti.ms/LGf2kV (Quentin Hardy, Claire Cain Miller) How Many Requests for User Information is Twitter Receiving? [read post]
4 May 2012, 8:06 am
Cain 725 WHEN AND HOW TO TEACH ELECTION LAW IN THE UNDERGRADUATE CLASSROOM ………………………………………………… Paul Gronke 735 ELECTION LAW AS ELECTIVE OF CHOICE ………….. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 2:59 am
Paul at a campaign stop in Iowa last year. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:00 am
bit.ly/zSHju8 (Greg Buckles) Why Wait for Congress to Rule on e-Discovery? [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 3:56 pm
Anyone can dissect a so-called "story" or column by E. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 9:01 am
[W]e can do — targeted identification. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 8:41 am
I just could not bring myself to watch and write a blog on the first half of the debate as this took so long and it was already late at night In general, this was a really bad debate because, as is usually the case, instead of answering the specific question they were asked, almost without exception, the candidates talked about something that either had occurred when they were in office or for legislation which they had supported at some time long ago. [read post]
