Search for: "PAUL W GREEN V CONSUMERS POWER CO "
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2010, 3:51 pm
WILLIAM W. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 7:43 am
Greene, Greene LLP, Boston Raoul D. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 4:44 pm
State law required Paul V. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 4:44 pm
State law required Paul V. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:57 am
This guest post was written by Paul B. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
Paul, Christopher P. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am
Can consumers verify Vierzon? [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 3:54 pm
While immunity was extended during Watergate to two top Nixon officials, John W. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
– Donald W. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Given the cost of preparing the required reports, it is possible that some firms – especially those that are not worried about the adverse publicity or consumer or investor backlash – will opt to pay the penalty instead, though doing so may open them to reputation damage from nonprofit environmental groups, consumers, and pro-climate companies. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 7:52 pm
Jindal Global University; Formerly Professor and Dean, Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, India Enforcing Socio-Economic Rights through Public Interest Litigation: An Overview of the Indian Experience 3) Dr Leïla Choukroune, Senior Lecturer in International Economic Law, Faculty of Law, Maastricht University, The Netherlands The Paradox of Justiciability: Labour PIL in China and India Questions/Comments 6:30pm-8:30pm – Welcome Dinner hosted by the City University Law School (by… [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
The California Air Resources Board announced Wednesday that it has penalized Conopco Inc. d/b/a Unilever $1.3 million for illegal consumer sales of AXE Deodorant Bodyspray for Men. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 2:14 pm
Publishers, c2009.Civil ProcedureKF8841 .G59 2009The Glannon guide to civil procedure : learning civil procedure through multiple-choice questions and analysis / Joseph W. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
The SEC explained: [W]e believe that NEPA requires and authorizes the Commission to consider the promotion of environmental protection along with other considerations in determining whether to require affirmative disclosures by registrants under the Securities Act and the Securities and Exchange Act . . . . [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
District Judge Roger W. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court in Kokesh v. [read post]
