Search for: "PAXTON v. STATE"
Results 141 - 160
of 287
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2022, 6:20 pm
NetChoice, LLC v. [read post]
17 May 2022, 3:57 pm
Paxton Contact: DavidGreeneCivil Liberties Directordavidg@eff.org [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 7:36 am
To bypass the highly relevant Herbert v. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
Two years later, the Court followed this up in Pierce v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 9:54 am
The state claims NetChoice said ONLY those three entities are covered. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 8:36 am
" The state Court of Appeals in Abbott v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 9:03 pm
Paxton reasoned that gender-affirming treatments can qualify as child abuse because they “can and do cause sterilization,” and “the United States Constitution protects a fundamental right to procreation. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 10:15 am
Ron DeSantis and Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 5:18 am
AG Paxton is supporting the state employer. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 9:49 am
Paxton and NetChoice v. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 7:09 am
Paxton, Isaac v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 7:00 am
Supreme Court held in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 9:12 am
No benefit the state may assert can outweigh the countervailing public interest in protecting consumers. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 2:44 pm
Last week, the Supreme Court refused for a second time to block SB8, effectively dismissing suits filed against Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a couple of state court officials and a private party and retaining suits only against various state licensing officials. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 11:11 am
The providers also cannot sue the state attorney general, Ken Paxton, to prevent him from enforcing S.B. 8, Gorsuch continued. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 11:32 am
” [cite to USTA v. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 6:55 am
The post Catching Up on NetChoice v. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 11:30 am
Taylor v. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 11:30 am
Taylor v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 4:30 pm
Jackson and United States v. [read post]
