Search for: "PEEK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA" Results 1 - 20 of 24
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2009, 10:00 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
Unfortunately the debate is still out on America and Europe, but legal institutions should not continue to be accomplice to this ill-informed analysis. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 8:00 am by Julie Brown
Today marks the start of another term for the Supreme Court of the United States of America. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 3:52 pm by Rick
I’m talking about the latest case from the United States Supreme Court — Florence v. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 5:48 am
This paper seeks to examine those aspects.[2]Bank & Customer - Misrepresentation:There was an economic slowdown happening in the United States of America with the "Sub Prime" crisis, ever since July-August 2007. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 11:11 am
It will be interesting to see how the Supreme Court treats the case in a world faced with an increasing number of both national-security and environmental hazards.Meanwhile, the dolphins (and whales for that matter) have no idea that this is playing out in the highest court in the land of something called the United States of America. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
John's University School of LawKatherine Schostok, DePaul University College of LawAllison Winnike, University of Houston Law Center 5:00 – 7:00 PM Welcome Reception – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law Friday, June 9, 20177:30 – 8:15 AM Registration & Breakfast – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law 8:15 – 8:30 AM Opening Remarks – Ceremonial Courtroom, Georgia State LawWendy Hensel, Interim Dean and Professor of Law, Georgia… [read post]
” One can still read the Missouri statute, plausibly, to make his behavior a crime.In a 2009 case, United States v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 4:55 am by Marie Louise
(IPKat)   United States US Patent Reform Campaign against America Invents Act intensifies (Inventive Step) Will you be crushed like a bug? [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The problem for the states in these cases is that if their only reason to ban same-sex marriage is religious, the bans are unconstitutional under Lemon v. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 12:46 am
See, e.g., In re United Mine Workers of America Employee Benefit Plans Litig., 159 F.R.D. 307, 312 (D.D.C. 1994) (waiver of work product limited to materials actually disclosed, because the party did not deliberately disclose documents in an attempt to gain a tactical advantage). [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 9:30 pm by Peter L. Strauss
Do we really need to be concerned that newspapers and the public misunderstand United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 1:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at [feeds.feedburner.com]Highlights this week included:Chinese company Zhongyi Electronic sues Microsoft for alleged patent infringement relating to technology that converts Roman characters to Chinese characters: (Jurist), (China Hearsay), (IP Dragon),US Patent reform and surrounding controversy: general commentary and opinions: (Patent Baristas), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (Patent … [read post]