Search for: "PENSKE LOGISTICS LLC"
Results 21 - 39
of 39
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2012, 8:25 am
Penske Logistics, LLC, also holding that California’s meal and rest period laws are within the preemptive scope of the FAAAA. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 7:26 am
The court found that “[t]here are no holes, no conflicting statements, simply nothing that indicates inaccuracies in [the employer’s] story” (Olson v Penske Logistics, LLC, August 26, 2016, McKay, M.). [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 1:07 pm
Penske Logistics LLC (discussed here), Judge Jacqueline Nguyen in the Central District of California has dismissed a putative class action brought by a group of route delivery drivers against Performance Food Group in Esquivel v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 11:54 am
Penske Logistics, LLC, the Ninth Circuit decided, for the first time, that such preemption generally does not apply. [read post]
17 May 2013, 8:00 am
Penske Logistics LLC, 819 F.Supp.2d 1109 (2011) (FAAAA preempts meal period and rest period claims by delivery drivers). [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
Penske Logistics, LLC, 267 F.R.D. 625, 638 (S.D.Cal.2010) (finding potential violations given evidence of informal anti-meal-period policies “enforced through ‘ridicule’ or ‘reprimand’ ”)). [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 4:36 am
Penske Logistics, LLC, a court in the Southern District of California granted summary judgment on meal and rest break claims brought against a trucking company. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 7:43 am
Penske Logistics, LLC, 757 F.3d 1078 (9th Cir. 2014). [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 7:43 am
Penske Logistics, LLC. [read post]
10 May 2019, 7:27 am
Penske Logistics, LLC [on July 9, 2014, the Ninth Circuit ruled that California’s Meal and Rest Break rules were not preempted by the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994]. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 11:26 am
Penske Logistics, LLC, which found no preemption arising from the FAAAA, an entirely different statute than the Motor Carrier Safety Act, and which prohibits state laws that are “related to” prices, routes, or services of commercial motor vehicles. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 12:24 pm
Penske Logistics, Inc., 867 So. 2d 418, 420 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 12:58 pm
Penske Logistics LLC, No. 08-cv-318, 2011 U.S. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:40 pm
Penske Logistics, LLC (S.D.Cal. 2010) 267 F.R.D. 625, 638 (Dilts), in which the district court found the use of statistical sampling would be an "acceptable method" to prove liability in a class action. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 7:09 pm
Penske Logistics, LLC (S.D.Cal. 2010) 267 F.R.D. 625, 638 [indicating informal anti-meal-break policy “enforced through ‘ridicule’ or ‘reprimand’ ” would be illegal].) [read post]
1 May 2015, 10:00 am
Penske Logistics, LLC v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 5:00 am
Penske Logistics, LLC, 267 F.R.D. 625 (S.D. [read post]
14 Apr 2012, 11:17 am
As I indicated in my prior post (located here), the real value of the Brinker opinion, at least from the plaintiff’s perspective, lays in the Court’s certification analysis. [read post]
