Search for: "PEOPLE v. KELLEY"
Results 81 - 100
of 142
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
PARISIAN TRANSCRIPTS 2.0 We had a number of people send us material after our first post with out list of deposition transcripts (and various other items) concerning the testimony of the extremely active plaintiffs’ side expert, Dr. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 12:41 pm
See, e.g., People v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:43 pm
Overcoming barriers to indigenous peoples’participation in forest carbon markets. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 6:02 am
A paperwork mistake was behind the ruling in BAC Home Loans Servicing v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 7:00 am
UPDATE: Instapundit reader Drew Kelley recommends the current season of Downton Abbey if they’re looking for a WWI-era setting. [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 6:20 am
For the facts, see United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 10:29 am
Kelley Larry A. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 5:28 pm
Where yesterday it was Wal-Mart v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:21 am
That was the question the 6th Circuit wrestled with in their decision last week in Muniz v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 1:18 pm
See, e.g., Crews v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 4:37 am
See McZeal v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 3:24 pm
This effective racial segregation led to the same types of separate and unequal schools held unconstitutional in the 1954 Brown v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:39 pm
On April 29, 2011, the Michigan Supreme Court published its opinion in People v Breidenbach, No. 140153. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 5:17 am
The court then said that while “numerous cases have held that it is possible for an individual to maintain more than one bona fide residence, in People v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm
Briefly, courts have adopted the learned intermediary rule because:Warnings go to physicians because they are the only people who know both a particular patient’s medical history as well as the risk/benefit profile of the drug/device being prescribed.Limiting warning duties to physicians makes the common law consistent with warning duties imposed by the FDA.Routing prescription drug/device information through the doctor preserves the physician/patient relationship from outside… [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:35 am
Kelley v. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 2:58 pm
Kelley, 482 F.3d 1047. 1055 (9th Cir. 2007) (Thomas, J., dissenting); United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 1:18 pm
Most people have seen those two books as rather different -- the first interested more in economic issues and common law; the second more jurisprudence and constitutional law. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 8:53 am
Miller v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 12:00 pm
The United States Supreme Court explained this rationale in the nineteenth century case, Rude v. [read post]
