Search for: "PEOPLES v. UNITED STATES" Results 1 - 20 of 22,506
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2024, 11:42 am by Richard Hunt
The ADA was not intended to create equality by bringing everyone down to the same low level of participation in the economic and social life of the United States. [read post]
9 May 2024, 5:55 am by Mutasim Ali
Twenty years ago, a massive movement emerged in the United States rallying behind the populations at risk of genocide in Darfur. [read post]
8 May 2024, 1:28 pm by NARF
United States (Treaty Rights; "Bad Men" Provision) Reges v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Bass and Jonathan Glater of counsel), for The New York City Bar Association, amicus curiae.Moulton, J.The New York City public school system is the largest in the United States. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Bass and Jonathan Glater of counsel), for The New York City Bar Association, amicus curiae.Moulton, J.The New York City public school system is the largest in the United States. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
The complaint (full text) in People of the State of New York v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 3:42 pm by Brian Shiffrin
In People v Reeves (152 AD3d 1173, 1176 [4th Dept 2017]), the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, suppressed identification testimony based on the alleged unreliability of the witness's identification, despite the fact that the identification was not the product of unduly suggestive police procedures. [read post]
7 May 2024, 2:19 pm by Ilya Somin
Story, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States, 3:674-75, § 1800 (1833), and "place the citizens of each State upon the same footing with citizens of other States. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:32 am by vforberger
L. 112-40 (2011) applied to PUA benefits, as PUA benefits qualify as an “unemployment compensation program of the United States” for which a minimum 15% administrative concealment penalty must be charged. [read post]
Contesting the state’s segregationist policy, they took their case (Parker v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The FTC argues that the proposed acquisition would result in “substantial effects on employment wages, benefits and conditions for people who work for or seek employment from the parties and their brands. [read post]