Search for: "PEOPLES v. UNITED STATES" Results 221 - 240 of 22,499
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2020, 3:00 pm
  The Fourteenth Amendment just implies (at most) that states can take away the right of felons to vote, not that it should (and certainly not that it must). [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 11:00 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
” In reaching its decision, the Court reaffirmed its holding in United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 6:29 am by Gerard Magliocca
Over on Balkinization, I wrote a post raising questions about the Fifth Circuit’s decision earlier this week in United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Peck and constitutional development in the Early United States. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:58 am by Alison Macdonald, Matrix.
On 30 January, the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Brown, Kerr, Dyson and Wilson) will hear the case of PP (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (formerly VV (Jordan) and PP (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department). [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 2:44 pm by Amy Howe
United States, the federal government’s challenge to Arizona’s aggressive efforts to reduce the number of illegal immigrants in that state. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 2:35 pm by Steven R. Morrison
 After all, as Justice Holmes said in Gitlow v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 1:12 pm by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Colvin, May 31, 2016, United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit More Blog Entries: Mabry v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 12:00 am
In light of recent comments, questions, and Facebook posts, I thought I’d take a moment to clarify some misconceptions about the Supreme Court’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 5:35 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
It is systematically dismantling voting rights protections that make it possible for every voter to have an equal voice, and for every political party to compete fairly for control of the United States government. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 11:07 am by Matthew Kahn
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit disagreed, concluding that it was bound by its 2010 decision in United States v. [read post]