Search for: "PEREZ v. CALIFORNIA"
Results 241 - 260
of 313
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2010, 11:17 am
Westlaw Insider's Jon Hanke has a very interesting post today about the California Supreme Court decision, Perez v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 6:46 am
INS, 213 F.3d 1179, 1186 (9th Cir.2000) (affirming use of telephonic testimony for hearing in California where witness was in Missouri); Scott Timber, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 11:07 am
Perez v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 11:15 am
Bringing a challenge to same-sex marriage to federal court in 2010 is a little like trying to get the federal courts to decide Lawrence in 1972 or Loving in 1948, immediately after California's decision in Perez v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 12:22 pm
Today in U.S. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:00 pm
Perez (Oregon)Elektra v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 8:52 am
Those who hoped that President Barack Obama would champion the kind of education reform needed to help close the racial achievement gap may have been more optimistic than the evidence warranted, but their hope was not entirely far-fetched. [read post]
4 May 2010, 11:31 am
(People v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 6:35 am
Arguing that the Court should strike down the California law at issue in the case, Jared Newman of PCWorld observes that even without the law, “[v]ideo games [already] have a system of self-regulation that’s among the best in the entertainment industry. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 4:10 am
LEXIS 32558 (MD FL, April 2, 2010), a Florida federal district court rejected a Muslim inmate's complaint over a 35 minute delay in delivering his bagged meal for Ramadan.In Perez v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 1:30 pm
A Building Component does not become Common Area just because it was placed or built on the Common Area -- California HOA attorney David Swedelson blogs on a recent appellate case that sounds strikingly similar to our Court of Appeal’s ruling in Wentworth Condo Corp. 198 v. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 9:53 am
Bank v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 4:01 pm
According to CNET at least two class actions have already been filed in the Californian courts, including one (Thomson v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 4:05 am
In Perez v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 10:51 am
You've got a court in California, but nobody else, allowing "misrepresentation" liability for a brand-name company in a generic drug case. [read post]
24 Oct 2009, 1:52 pm
According to CNET at least two class actions have already been filed in the Californian courts, including one (Thomson v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 8:42 am
Related posts:YouTube v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 2:47 am
NidekThe first of these was Perez v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 9:48 pm
Burlage v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 2:47 am
For Further Reading: The Cruz-Perez decision incorrectly flips the lead Supreme Court decision's name: the correct cite is Irizarry v. [read post]
