Search for: "PEREZ v. CALIFORNIA"
Results 281 - 300
of 313
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2008, 6:42 am
California Date Growers Assn., 57 Cal. [read post]
28 May 2008, 5:39 am
The opinion is here.In Gomez-Perez v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
Ctr. for Women v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:55 am
Supreme Court, May 12, 2008 Gonzales v. [read post]
17 May 2008, 5:14 pm
The California Supreme Court relied on its own decision invalidating an anti-miscegenation law, Perez v. [read post]
17 May 2008, 4:06 pm
Where same-sex marriage is prohibited, the clerk must, in doubtful cases, require the applicants to drop their pants or lift their skirts in order to know whether it is permissible to issue the marriage license.The California court distinguishes the miscegenation decisions, including its own groundbreaking Perez v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 4:18 pm
To have an opinion, in Greenwald's opinion:One must have read and understood the key cases on which the Court relied, such as Perez v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 11:57 am
It will, I think, come to be seen as part of the grand tradition of that Court, as exemplified by its bold 1948 decision in Perez v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 10:16 am
The court referred to Perez v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 5:15 am
In Kaufman v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 11:24 am
What meaning this old ruling, Perez v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 4:13 pm
And he got plenty of grilling, like from Chief Justice Ronald George: When Lavy tried arguing a distinction in Perez v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 11:33 am
George has quoted liberally from passages of Perez v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 11:07 am
In Perez v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 9:35 am
In Valley Advocates v. [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 4:00 pm
On Tuesday, the Court is scheduled to hear argument in Gomez-Perez v. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 4:59 pm
What, if any, are the minimum, constitutionally-guaranteed substantive attributes or rights that are embodied within the fundamental constitutional “right to marry” that is referred to in cases such as Perez v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Supreme Court, January 22, 2008 Ali v. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 9:08 am
Perez v. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 6:01 am
One key provision of USERRA is that an employer may not limit, by contract or otherwise, any rights granted under that statute.In Perez v. [read post]
