Search for: "PERFUMEBAY.COM, INC. V EBAY INC."
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2008, 4:51 pm
Perfumebay.com Inc. v. eBay Inc., No. 05-56794, 14521 (9th Cir. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 8:51 am
Perfumebay.com Inc. v. eBay Inc., No. 05-56794, 14521 (9th Cir. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 11:23 am
That pits a company with the "perfumebay.com" site against a company with the "ebay.com" site.The winner? [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 7:29 pm
Perfumebay.com v. eBay, Inc. _ Fed 3D _ (9th Cir. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 1:52 pm
Perfumebay.com Inc. v. eBay Inc., No. 05-56794 (9th Cir. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 8:36 pm
”The case cite is Perfumebay.com Inc. v. eBay Inc., Nos. 05-56794 and 05-56902. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 2:32 pm
"More detail of Perfumebay.com, Inc. v. eBay Inc. after the jump. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 3:38 am
V EBAY INC. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 11:28 am
Perfumebay.com Inc v. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:40 am
In support of this opposition, eBay cites Perfumebay.com Inc. v. eBay Inc., 506 F3d 1165 (9th Cir., Nove. 5, 2007) where the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals stated that the term "BAY" was the dominant portion of the eBay mark. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 9:33 am
In that case, Perfumebay.com, Inc. v. eBay, Inc., - - - F.3d - - - (9th Cir. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 6:30 am
And, because a lesser degree of similarity is required when a trademark holder’s mark is strong, the commercial strength of the “POM” mark amplifies the significance of the marks’ many similarities See Perfumebay.com Inc. v. eBay Inc., 506F.3d 1165, 1174 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[T]he fact that the similarity involves the use of a much stronger mark would make that similarity weigh more heavily in the analysis of this factor. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 10:29 pm
” (See Perfumebay.com v. eBay, Inc., 506 F.3d 1165, 1174-75 (Fed. [read post]
