Search for: "PETER DOE"
Results 61 - 80
of 9,998
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2014, 7:23 pm
Peter offers none. [read post]
27 May 2009, 11:07 am
Deborah Hellman sent me the following thoughts on the California Supreme Court's Prop 8 decision and Peter Westen, which I post below: "Peter Westen famously argued that equality is an empty idea. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 11:43 am
Alvarez-Machain, curbs the power of federal courts to create federal common law, but does not abridge Congress’s power. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 3:45 am
Daniel Sokol Mo Xiao (University of Arizona) and Peter F. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 3:45 am
Daniel Sokol Mo Xiao (University of Arizona) and Peter F. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 11:00 pm
Even a whole life tariff does not necessarily mean “whole life”. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 1:05 pm
So does Marcy (Empty Wheel.) [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 6:55 am
Whether Article III does–or should–sweep more broadly than Quirin‘s text expressly allows, to include offenses that are not international war crimes but over which international law and practice does support the assertion of military jurisdiction–is an interesting question, and one on which reasonable minds can (and will) surely differ. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 12:37 pm
So, it’ll be interesting to see, does that, and I guess it does, just the way technology evolves anyway, but even in the legal profession, how much more quickly things will evolve over the next several decades. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 4:20 am
Peter Margulies of Roger Williams School of Law writes in with the following comments on yesterday’s Clapper decision: The Supreme Court’s decision Tuesday in Clapper v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 7:04 am
Pray It Does Not Alter It Any Further. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 9:00 am
He asks the innkeeper, “Does your dawg bite? [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:18 am
Those with this view suggested that calling the “unable or unwilling” formulation a “test,” as Deeks does, might suggest that jus ad bellum rules have evolved further than some commentators accept.. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 4:07 am
The trial of New York City Police Officer Peter Liang is beginning. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:53 pm
One does wonder whether the Nobel Prize Committee is suffering from at least a modicum of buyer’s remorse. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 12:17 pm
And Does Anyone Care? [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 4:25 am
Nor, as most presenters agreed, does state consent necessarily alter this analysis. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 1:25 am
This does mean, of course, mean that if the Deputy Speaker, Anna Burke, is acting, the casting vote will be exercised in the Government's favour. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 8:51 am
The trial judge quoted from the harsh and oft-cited judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada in Peter Kiewit Sons’ Co. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 3:00 am
The post Court Does Not Accept COVID-19 as Justification for Frustration of Contract appeared first on Peter A. [read post]
