Search for: "PHILLIPS v. MCDONALD " Results 1 - 20 of 55
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2010, 11:24 am by Anna Christensen
The commentary on this week’s oral argument in McDonald v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 2:22 am by Nick Armstrong, Matrix
KM will see exactly the same court again, plus Lord Phillips and Lord Wilson. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 5:04 am
Rozenberg's article speculates that Lord Neuberger - presently Master of the Rolls - would be in line to become the court's next President, though Rozenberg admits of other possibilities including Lady Hale who gave a dissenting judgment in R (McDonald) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea [2011], which appears to have irritated some of her male colleagues - see, for example, the judgment at para 27. [read post]
22 May 2011, 12:00 pm by Blog Editorial
R (McDonald) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, heard 4 – 5 April 2011. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 2:34 pm by Giles Peaker
McDonald v McDonald & Ors [2016] UKSC 28 The Supreme Court has finally decided on the issue that has been hanging over private sector possession claims since Pinnock and Powell – whether article 8 proportionality of eviction defence might also apply to the private sector as well as to public body landlords. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 3:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff’s breach of fiduciary duty and breach of contract claims were properly dismissed as duplicative of the legal malpractice claim (see Courtney v McDonald, 176 AD3d 645, 646 [1st Dept 2019]). [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Department of Justice (Sept. 7) have both weighed in with amicus briefs in the Supreme Court’s fall-term case of Masterpiece Cakeshop Ltd. v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 11:37 am by MOTP
McDonald, this Court held that “an agreement in advance to waive or not plead the statutes of limitation is void as against public policy. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 7:03 am by Anna Christensen
The Chicago Sun-Times reported yesterday on an amicus brief filed this week by 55 members of Congress, including Democrat Mike Quigley of Chicago, in McDonald v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 4:12 am by Blog Editorial
Phillip Tillet v The Queen (Belize), heard 9 June 2011. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 8:10 am by Walter Olson
[James McDonald/Fisher & Phillips, HR Morning, Boston Herald, related editorial] As critics warned at the time, Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblowing provisions make a versatile weapon for employment plaintiffs [Daniel Schwartz] “Is Your Job Too Hard? [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:19 am by Blog Editorial
Phillip Tillet v The Queen (Belize), heard 9 June 2011. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 11:31 pm by Blog Editorial
Second, on 6 and 7 April 2011, Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker, Mance and Clarke will hear Jivraj v Hashwani. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:59 am
  Here was my post about  the case’s  first trip to the Court, back in October of 2006: Today’s Moment of Duh comes courtesy of the plaintiff’s decedent in the case of Phillip Morris v. [read post]