Search for: "PHIPPS v. STATE"
Results 41 - 60
of 70
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2014, 10:46 pm
In her affidavit of services the guardian ad litem stated that she spent 7.2 hours on the matter, representing a charge of $2,828.00 for services rendered. [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 10:42 pm
In her affidavit of services the guardian ad litem stated that she spent 7.2 hours on the matter, representing a charge of $2,828.00 for services rendered. [read post]
3 May 2014, 7:01 am
After Phipps from Florida came Wiedenmayer v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 6:49 am
As an initial matter, the court rejected the employee’s argument for a broader reading of its decision in Phipps v Clark Oil & Refining Corp to recognize an exception to the employment-at-will rule for any violation of a clear mandate of the state’s public policy. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 2:06 am
Monaghan v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 1:11 am
One of the most cheerful souls you are ever likely to encounter in the often oh-so-serious world of intellectual property is this Kat's friend and fellow blogger Tania Phipps-Rufus. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 3:03 pm
In Phipps, et al. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 1:03 pm
In Phipps, et al. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 1:03 pm
In Phipps, et al. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 4:25 pm
The victim must prove the employer knew the employee was unfit for the job and verify the victim’s injury was foreseeable (see Phipps v. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 1:16 pm
On October 2, three named plaintiffs filed a third lawsuit against Wal-Mart entitled Phipps, et al. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 4:44 pm
In the case of Phipps v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 6:00 am
No. 10–0010 MUELLER, BROWN, KRUSE, MILLER, and PHIPPS, v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 5:58 am
At the Wall Street Journal Law Blog, Chelsea Phipps discusses the prospect that the government may have a more difficult time regulating false or misleading commercial speech in the wake of United States v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 6:42 am
Al-Sirri v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 14 – 15 May 2012. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:29 pm
(Phipps, P.J. and Dillard, J. concurring)*For other cases discussing the voluntary departure rule, see Chamblee v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 7:32 am
The case of Phipps v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 12:16 pm
Judge Phipps continued: I find persuasive the opinion of the Ohio Supreme Court in Ohio v. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 4:08 pm
This is in line with one of the “limiting principles” in the law of breach of confidence, as stated in the Spycatcher litigation (Attorney-General v Observer Ltd [1990] 1 AC 109 HL) that the law would not protect the trivial or the anodyne. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 3:00 am
Phipps, 113 So. 419, 421 (Fla. 1927); Steele v. [read post]
