Search for: "PIERCE v. PIERCE" Results 61 - 80 of 2,336
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2014, 6:47 am by Michael Smith
Last week the LLC Law Monitor blog by Doug Batey of Stoel Rives commented on a Massacusetts case, Kosanovich v. 80 Worcester Street Associates, LLC, No. 201201 CV 001748, 2014 WL 2565959 (Mass. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 12:39 pm
You don't see a "reverse" piercing the corporate veil case very often, but the Business Court decided one yesterday in Health Management Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 9:42 pm by Steve Bainbridge
As regular readers know, I have argued in two articles--Using Reverse Veil Piercing to Vindicate the Free Exercise Rights of... [[ This is a content summary only. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 1:44 pm by susan
The Ontario Court of Appeal’s (“ONCA’s”) decision in FNF Enterprises Inc. v Wag and Train Inc.[1] provides a framework for when a director may be personally liable under each remedy. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:47 am by Steve Bainbridge
Josh Fershee recently flagged an Illinois case in which the court invoked veil piercing in a criminal case: See People v. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 3:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
In April, Mary Jane Pierce was born prematurely at 25 weeks with serious health problems. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 3:04 am by sally
Piercing the corporate veil is currently a hot topic with a difference of opinion between various judges on several of the finer points, especially in a contractual context (compare Burton J in Gramsci v Stepanovs [2011] EWCH 333 Comm with Arnold J in VTB v Nutritek [2011] EWCH 3107 CH). [read post]