Search for: "PIERCE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA" Results 1 - 20 of 103
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Before us in the present is a 49-page document docketed as 23-cr-80101 in the Southern District of Florida, conspicuously captioned: United States of America v. [read post]
” Perhaps viral video recordings of Black Americans being beaten, tortured, and executed only reinforce white supremacy in the United States? [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 9:15 pm
We affirm all of the district court's decisions except for its dismissal of the United States of America in the FTCA action, because Jackson's amendment naming the United States related back to his original pleading, which was timely filed. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 4:58 pm
O'Donnell has responded that he would be willing to plead to a misdemeanor and pay a large fine, however, representatives of the United States Attorneys Office for the Southern District of California have stated that they would require O'Donnell to plead guilty to a felony. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:39 pm
§ 227 Unsolicited Advertisement     Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit. [read post]
District Court for the State of Maine issued an order granting a  motion to suppress evidence in United States of America v. [read post]
12 May 2015, 2:47 pm by John C. Manoog III
The Appellate Court’s Decision The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed the district court’s dismissal of the suit. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 7:16 am
Scott Pierce Requirement under subsection 102(f) of Title 35 of the United States Code that a person “himself invent the subject matter sought to be patented” has been removed by the Leahy-Smith American Invents Act (AIA) of 2011. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 2:27 pm by Gangemi P.C.
Merril Lynch, 13 CV 1531, Judge Baer rejected motions to compel arbitration filed by Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc; and Bank of America Corporation. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 11:24 am by Larry
Both decisions are in the case United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 5:23 am by Jon May
What is critical is that Judge Cannon crossed way over the line when she refused to follow the decision of the United States Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 5:00 am
District Court Judge who has the case began her opinion by noting that [d]uring a trial that lasted approximately one week, the United States presented evidence that [Shahulhameed] was terminated from his position at Toyota Engineering & Manufacturing North America -- where he worked as a subcontractor -- on August 23, 2012. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 5:08 am by Russell Jackson
  The second is perhaps more difficult for some people to swallow:  "Because the United States is a distinct sovereign, a defendant may in principle be subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of the United States but not of any particular State. [read post]