Search for: "PILLSBURY COMPANY V US" Results 41 - 60 of 67
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2015, 3:08 pm by Carl Vennitti
Prior to July of 2003, V&V Enterprises, Inc., did business as Mauro Brand Products and been marketing and selling “pocket sandwiches” since coming under inspection by the USDA in 1991. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 11:13 am by Bryan J. Coffey
Scottsdale Insurance Company and McMillin Management Services v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 1:04 am
ALM Privacy Policy / Contact Us © 2007 ALM Properties, Inc. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:30 am by Kelly
(IP Spotlight) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: The great haste and less milling: Beer v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 11:16 am
Harley-Davidson dealt with the functionality hurdle when it applied to register "the exhaust sound of applicant's motorcycles, produced by V-twin, common crankpin motorcycle engines when the goods are in use," and was opposed by several other competing motorcycle companies. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 11:16 am
Harley-Davidson dealt with the functionality hurdle when it applied to register “the exhaust sound of applicant’s motorcycles, produced by V-twin, common crankpin motorcycle engines when the goods are in use,” and was opposed by several other competing motorcycle companies. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 11:44 pm
Gun Case Legal Times The Supreme Court announced Tuesday it will take up the case of District of Columbia v. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 12:12 pm by Ailyn Cabico
Questions regarding new Rule 506(c), the CFTC rules, Rule 156 and other implications regarding this recent SEC action should be directed to your Pillsbury attorney contact. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 8:00 pm
: (IPKat),Spare part design protection: the European Parliament's view: (IPKat), (Catch us if you can)Cyprus fails to delight Turkey -  Cyprus is to gain PGI recognition for Turkish delight: (IPKat),Mewsings on the word ‘technical' (What does the EPO mean when it uses the word ‘technical'?) [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 1:59 am
 FSIS has yet to learn this valuable lesson.The July 10, 2000 edition of Food Chemical News, discussing the SB litigation, stated that:  "In a landmark court ruling in May, the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas prohibited USDA from concluding that grinding plants are insanitary or that their products are adulterated based on Salmonella test results (Supreme Beef Processors Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 2:52 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Finally, a May 26, 2010 memo from the Pillsbury Winthrop law firm discusses the Second Circuit’s May 18, 2010 decision in Slayton v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 8:33 am by Ad Law Defense
Plan of the Pillsbury Co., 268 F.3d 456, 459 (7th Cir. 2001) (same); see also Nat’l Assoc. of the Deaf, et al. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 12:54 am
ALM Privacy Policy / Contact Us © 2007 ALM Properties, Inc. [read post]