Search for: "PLAINTIFF v. DEFENDANT" Results 1 - 20 of 75,849
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term 2023 Argued: March 19, 2024 Decided: May 10, 2024 No. 23-1217 JASON DOHERTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term 2023 Argued: March 19, 2024 Decided: May 10, 2024 No. 23-1217 JASON DOHERTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 2:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“In this legal malpractice action, plaintiff, an attorney acting pro se, alleges that defendants Bellinson Law, LLC, and Robert J. [read post]
16 May 2024, 10:30 pm by Michael Chatzipanagiotis
In its judgment in C-173/23 Eventmedia Soluciones SL v Air Europa Líneas Aéreas SAU ECLI:EU:C:2024:295 (Judgment), the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled on some aspects of the duty of national courts to assess of their own motion the unfairness of contractual terms in the context of air carriage under the 1999 Montreal Convention on the liability of the international air carrier (MC99). [read post]
15 May 2024, 8:49 am by Steven Cohen
Summary: Construction Expert Witness testimony excluded because the court ruled that the expert cannot state that the Chinese drywall caused the plaintiffs’ injuries Facts: This case (Fozard et al v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Following its creation, defendant elected to proceed on the charges against plaintiff that had previously been brought by JCOPE.Prior to any hearings related to the charges against him, plaintiff commenced the instant action for declaratory judgment seeking to find Executive Law § 94 unconstitutional and moved to enjoin defendant from any further action on the pending charges against him. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Following its creation, defendant elected to proceed on the charges against plaintiff that had previously been brought by JCOPE.Prior to any hearings related to the charges against him, plaintiff commenced the instant action for declaratory judgment seeking to find Executive Law § 94 unconstitutional and moved to enjoin defendant from any further action on the pending charges against him. [read post]