Search for: "PLAY, Inc. v. NIKE, INC." Results 21 - 40 of 44
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
The first of these is GO Outdoors Ltd v Skechers USA Inc II [2015] EWHC 1405 (Ch), a 19 May decision of Mrs Justice Rose, sitting in the Chancery Division, England and Wales, on an appeal from a decision of the UK Intellectual Property Office. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 12:45 pm by Inside Privacy
Nike held that the claims could proceed past the motion to dismiss stage. [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 11:43 pm by Lara
Nike 3, Jesuits 0 Facebook v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:40 pm by WIMS
The analysis found that some American companies, including NRG Energy, Inc., NIKE, Inc. and AES Corporation, accept the findings of climate science and have taken actions in support of science-based policy. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:49 am by Marie Louise
– General Court rejects appeal concerning speed reducing gearbox Case T-246/10 Francisco Ivars v OHIM – Motive intervening (Class 99) Nike in General Court: DYNAMIC SUPPORT and VICTORY RED: T-512/10, T-356/10 (Class 46) General Court: PIPELINE and absolute grounds: T-87/10 (Class 46) Is territoriality dead? [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
Wal-Mart Stores Inc, et al (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) District Court N D Illinois: Inventor/plaintiff’s Managing Director not given highly confidential technical information: McDavid Knee Guard Inc v Nike USA Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Pennsylvania: Warsaw Orthpedic awarded $2M in Globus patent dispute (Patent Docs) District Court E D Texas: ‘I have good cause but it’s a… [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 5:07 am by SHG
Supreme Court was poised to decide the question whether corporate image advertising is commercial speech in Nike, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 10:39 am by Aaron Moss
Unlike literary works such as novels, plays and motion pictures, the Ninth Circuit previously held in Rentmeester v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 2:02 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Maybe Nike should have exclusive rights to put Nike on a T-shirt even if no right to prevent “Nike sucks” or other variations. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 12:48 pm by Shu-Yi Oei
 and Nike Inc., congressional Democrats and tax-advocacy groups said. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 11:59 am by Jason Rantanen
Nike, Inc., 568 U.S. 85 (2013)), or dedicated to the public under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 5:24 pm by Kevin LaCroix
According to the Wall Street Journal, the company referred to in these “barely veiled references” is Nike, Inc. [read post]