Search for: "PMA COMPANIES, INC."
Results 21 - 40
of 74
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008); finding PMA preemption under Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 5:00 am
Jude Medical, Inc., 953 F. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 11:40 am
Cal. 2011)(taking judicial notice of PMA approval documents). [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 3:39 am
Medtronic, Inc., 2010 U.S. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 7:02 am
Please also describe the events leading to the voluntary recall, including any communications FDA had with the company regarding the recall and the dates of such communications. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 4:17 pm
I-Flow, LLC, Washington DC Injury Lawyer Blog, October 22, 2012 Photo credit: By SynCardia Systems, Inc. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 4:30 am
Synthes Spine, Inc., 2011 U.S. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 8:38 am
ReGen Biologics, Inc. obtained 510(k) clearance for the Menaflex in 2008 as a Class II device. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 5:43 pm
Pliva, Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 7:55 am
Murtha, Jr. - a former Marine, runs a company in Glen Burnie, Maryland, called Murtech Inc. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 9:20 am
The founder of the defendant company used to work for the plaintiff company, which no doubt added a bit of personal animosity to the mix. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 1:16 pm
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008). [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 2:00 am
Texas Mutual Insurance Company The Travelers Companies, Inc. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 5:00 am
Texas Mutual Insurance Company The Travelers Companies, Inc. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 12:05 pm
Circuit's March 2, 2010 decision in Teva Pharms USA, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 5:25 am
PLIVA, Inc., 713 F.3d 774 (5th Cir. 2013). [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 10:17 am
Medtronic, Inc., No. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 11:32 am
In re Medtronic, Inc. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 7:20 am
Statprobe, Inc., No. 05-1342, 2007 WL 3146792 (E.D. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 11:37 am
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008) (state law claims that impose requirements “different from or in addition to” FDA’s PMA requirements are preempted). [read post]
