Search for: "POLO V. STATE"
Results 21 - 40
of 156
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2020, 6:19 am
An illustration of this can be found in a 2020, opinion from the Eastern District, Sherman Division, in an opinion styled, Oscar Bermudez and SA Polo, Inc., v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 5:17 am
Korn v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 6:56 am
During that time, Respondent worked full-time at Polo Ralph Lauren ("Polo") as a technical designer, and Petitioner managed Soho IT Services, an information technology company that he owned for over twenty years, as of the date of the hearing in this action. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 6:21 am
Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation, et al. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 1:36 pm
. . .Trapp also went into the Polo outlet. . . . [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 3:00 am
Polo v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 12:01 pm
., LLC v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 12:25 pm
Otsuka v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 12:41 pm
State v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 12:45 am
A pair of LouboutinsElsewhere in the fashion industry, Kat friend Penelope Ng from Bird & Bird ATMD analyses the recent unsuccessful invalidation action brought by Polo/Lauren against Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club Ltd, in Singapore: Yet another horse – The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. v Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club Ltd. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 5:16 am
Chico-Polo v. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 9:09 am
What distinguishes this case, Bailey v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 6:02 am
The opinion is styled, Oscar Bermudez and SA Polo, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 11:11 am
* Polo not the same as football, but Royal Berks give Yanks a partial whippingJeremy pens of Case T 581/13 Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club v OHIM - Lifestyle Equities (Royal County of Berkshire POLO CLUB), a decision rendered last Thursday by the General Court of the European Union in another POLO-related tradebmark dispute involving many, many horses. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 4:24 am
Further, the Court stated that it is an established principle of settled case-law that, as a general rule, the submission of facts and evidence by the parties remains possible after the expiry of the relevant time limits, and the EUIPO is not prohibited from taking account of such facts and evidence (mobile.de v EUIPO, C‑418/16 P).In this case, it was accepted by both parties that Mr Noah had submitted the first evidence of use of the Mark within the time limit set by… [read post]
16 May 2018, 8:03 am
The complaint (full text) in Ramapough Mountain Indians, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:07 am
United States Polo Association Inc., defendants-appellees
NEW YORK COUNTYInsurance LawPolice Report, NF-2 Form Enough to Show Potential Merit to Insurer's Claims Assignor Employed Lenox Hill Radiology PC v. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 1:56 pm
Co. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 10:00 pm
These marks related to (a) the word POLO; (b) pictorial devices of single polo players, each astride a pony engaged in play and (c) pictorial devices of two polo ponies, each with polo players astride them engaged in play. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 12:00 am
Polo Assoc., Inc. v. [read post]
