Search for: "POLO V. STATE"
Results 41 - 60
of 157
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2018, 6:38 am
| Yet another horse – The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. v Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club Ltd. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 1:48 am
| Yet another horse – The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. v Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club Ltd. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 12:45 am
A pair of LouboutinsElsewhere in the fashion industry, Kat friend Penelope Ng from Bird & Bird ATMD analyses the recent unsuccessful invalidation action brought by Polo/Lauren against Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club Ltd, in Singapore: Yet another horse – The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. v Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club Ltd. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 11:12 pm
However, the Principal Assistant Registrar stated that reference to trade mark registrations alone is not conclusive, as it does not reflect the situation in the market.The other registered trade marks could either be dissimilar or do not lead to a likelihood of confusion. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 12:00 am
Essenson v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 12:11 pm
State v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 4:59 pm
The appeals court affirmed, addressing only three of the issues raised by Goodman: (1) whether the State prematurely released his vehicle after his first trial in violation of his due process rights and requiring dismissal under California v. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 1:15 pm
Two cases:Dennis v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 3:00 am
Polo v. [read post]
18 May 2017, 7:19 am
Sources: Kokesh v. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 1:51 am
In Kokesh v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 10:24 am
Dupont De Nemours & Co. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 3:00 am
Polo v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 5:03 pm
As a result, HDOH ordered this product embargoed (not to be sold, purchased, or consumed) throughout the state, and the temporary closure of all Genki Sushi restaurants on Oahu and Kauai. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 6:54 am
Beverly Hills is famous for many things, including the activities of a vacationing policeman and - to a slightly lesser extent - its Polo team. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
(2) Does the ICCTA preempt a state agency’s voluntary commitments to comply with CEQA as a condition of receiving state funds for a state owned rail line and/or leasing state-owned property? [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 8:09 pm
V., Margolis, H. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 1:56 pm
Co. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 12:32 pm
In Goodman v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
In Polo v. [read post]
