Search for: "POM Wonderful, LLC"
Results 21 - 40
of 196
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2014, 6:27 am
Pom Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 2:45 am
Pom Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 6:59 am
In POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 9:18 am
Winters While today’s unanimous (sans Justice Breyer, who recused himself) decision by the Supreme Court in POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 2:59 am
POM Wonderful has upset another government agency by being way too enthusiastic about its products.After 19 months of investigation, the Federal Trade Commission Monday charged POM Wonderful LLC in an administrative complaint with making deceptive disease and treatment claims. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 11:14 am
Over the last several weeks, the Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”) and POM Wonderful LLC (“POM”), the makers of POM Wonderful 100% Pomegranate Juice and POMx supplements, have been engaged in a battle over the scope of the FTC’s authority to regulate advertisements and the propriety of claims POM has made in marketing its products. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 8:05 am
Pom Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 2:01 pm
In a 345-page Initial Decision by the Chief Administrative Law Judge, the FTC's complaint against POM Wonderful LLC (POM) and its principals was upheld to the extent that the company had claimed that its products would treat, prevent or reduce the risk of heart disease, prostate cancer and erectile dysfunction because these claims were not supported by sufficient competent and reliable evidence. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 6:24 am
POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 11:00 am
On January 16, 2013, the Federal Trade Commission in a 5-0 vote upheld a May 2012 Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) decision that POM Wonderful LLC (“POM”) and its owners had falsely advertised its POM Wonderful 100% Pomegranate Juice, and POMx liquid and pill supplements, by claiming that its products treat, prevent or reduce the risk of heart disease, prostate cancer, and erectile dysfunction, and that they were… [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 11:58 am
Id. at *8-9- (citing, amongst other cases, POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 9:20 am
Pom Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 11:29 am
Pom Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 9:48 am
Earlier this year, in POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:24 am
On September 13, 2010, POM Wonderful LLC, the maker of POM juice products, filed suit in Federal Court in Washington against the FTC claiming that the FTC’s recently modified substantiation standard for advertising encroaches on the authority of the FDA, violates POM’s 1st and 5th Amendment rights of free speech and due process, and violates the FTC’s Administrative Procedures Act’s own rulemaking procedures. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 3:26 am
See Pom Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 11:22 am
Pom Wonderful LLC (“Pom”), makes, markets, and sells POM WONDERFUL® an upscale pomegranate juice. [read post]
22 May 2012, 6:30 am
In the Matter of POM Wonderful LLC and Roll Global LLC, FTC File No. 082-3122 (May 21, 2012) Bottom line: while rejecting complaint counsel’s arguments that double-blind, randomized clinical trials were required to substantiate health claims of the sort made by Pom, the ALJ found that Pom didn’t meet the somewhat lower standard of reliable and competent scientific evidence either with respect to claims about heart health/disease,… [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 11:23 am
FTC Administrative Action On September 27, 2010, the FTC filed an administrative complaint against Pom Wonderful, LLC which markets POM Wonderful 100% Pomegranate Juice and POMx supplements, and the company's owners, Lynda and Stewart Resnick of Los Angeles, with making false and unsubstantiated claims that their products will treat or prevent heart disease, prostate cancer, and erectile dysfunction. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 8:42 am
This week, I was asked my thoughts on the Supreme Court’s recent decision to take up the Pom Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
