Search for: "POUND v. CAMPBELL" Results 1 - 20 of 141
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2020, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
In Antony & anr v Sivakumar, Richard Spearman QC, sitting as a deputy judge of the High Court, delivered an ex tempore judgment in which he ordered the defendant to pay both claimants £15,000 in damages. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 5:41 am by INFORRM
The 2004 decision of the House of Lords in Campbell v Mirror Group Newspapers ([2004] 2 AC 457) was a significant case regarding privacy, and for human rights law and tort law more generally. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 5:58 am by Simon Gibbs
The case of MGN Limited v United Kingdom (Application No. 39401/04) was a case involving the supermodel Naomi Campbell’s right to privacy versus a newspaper’s right to freedom of expression. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 1:00 am by CMS
In this post, Sophie Campbell, an Associate in the litigation team at CMS, previews the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Sara & Hossein Asset Holdings Ltd v Blacks Outdoor Retail Ltd. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 3:06 am
The success fees which Campbell sought to recover far outweighed the amount which she had recovered in damages (£365,077 success fees against £3,500 damages) and were disproportionate. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
The letter sought payment of £50,000 ‘financial recompense’, failing which the ‘details of the case’ would be released via news agencies and online. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 4:32 am by Siobhan Hayes
In this case, around £130 of default rate interest was overdue at the break date. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 9:18 pm by Simon Gibbs
, the decision of Costs Judge Master Campbell in Schneider v Door2door PTS Ltd [2011] EWHC 90210 (Costs) is worth reviewing. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 1:06 pm by Giles Peaker
Wilson v Campbell (HOUSING – RENT REPAYMENT ORDER) (2019) UKUT 363 (LC) In which the Upper Tribunal gives the First Tier Tribunal a thorough ticking off over its decision on a rent repayment order application. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm by ernst
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co v Campbell (2003): The Misguided Legacy of ProportionalityCatherine M Sharkey (New York University, USA)14. [read post]
22 May 2015, 4:00 am by INFORRM
  The Judge noted ([110]) that these included the protection of human autonomy and dignity (see Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] 2 AC 457 [51]). [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 9:56 am by Meg Martin
StateCitation: 2010 WY 11Docket Number: S-08-0233Appeal from the District Court of Campbell County, the Honorable Michael N. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
Civ 1373 (£2,500 for misuse of private information, £1,000 aggravated damages), Archer v Williams [2003] EWHC 1670 (QB) (£2,500 general damages for breach of confidence) and Douglas v Hello! [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 12:08 pm by Sheldon Toplitt
Although Campbell's damages were only 3500 pounds ($5,597)--more than the combined weight of 35 supermodels--the media defendant was assessed "success fees" totaling 1.1 million pounds ($1.7 million).The European Court of Human Rights found the assessment disproportionate to the damages suffered by the plaintiff and an attempt to stifle freedom of expression pursuant to Article 10 of the Convention on Human Rights. [read post]