Search for: "POUND v. CAMPBELL"
Results 21 - 40
of 141
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2011, 2:31 am
She was paid £16,000. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 6:24 am
In the case of Times Newspapers Ltd v Flood; Miller v Associated Newspapers Ltd; and, Frost and others v MGN Ltd ([2017] UKSC 33), the defendant media organisations each brought an appeal to the Supreme Court in relation to the obligation that they pay additional liabilities in cases engaging their right to freedom of expression. [read post]
28 May 2015, 4:11 am
Naomi Campbell got £4,000 for being photographed after drug therapy sessions (coupled with the publication of her drug regimen). [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 5:44 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKReal Property Unreliable Elevator Renders 14th Floor Luxury Co-Op Suite Unfit for Occupancy Campbell v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 11:40 am
But he added: “Projected total cost is £4,014,126, based on the total to date and projected future expenditure estimated by the Inquiry. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 4:09 pm
The decision in Campbell v MGN The facts of Campbell are well known. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 2:18 pm
She was paid £16,000. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 3:26 am
The amount that B previously paid by way of service charge was £55,000, whereas the service charge certificate issued in January 2019 was for £400,000. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 8:54 am
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v Campbell, 538 U.S. 408 (2003). [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 1:16 am
Supp. 2d 84 http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp2/320/84/2468802/ (The 'Wondeful World' case )and Acuff Rose Music v Campbell (1994) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campbell_v. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 7:52 am
Campbell, 538 US. 408,425 (2003). [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 8:32 am
In relation to ATE premiums, the judge noted that this had not been in issue in either MGN v UK or Campbell (No.2). [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 4:19 pm
The bill presented by Ms Campbell’s lawyers at the end of the case was for over £1m, almost 60% of which related to the House of Lords appeal: Campbell v MGN Ltd (No 2) ([2005] 1 WLR 3488). [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 2:52 am
These include Douglas v Hello (Catherine Zeta-Douglas and Michael Douglas wedding photos), Campbell v Mirror Group Newspapers (photos of Naomi Campbell leaving a clinic), or indeed the JK Rowling decision (JK Rowling's son entitlement to rivacy). [read post]
24 May 2018, 10:50 pm
Kat friend Jake Campbell of the TLT firm has shared his thoughts on the recent case of FIL Ltd & Anor v Fidelis Underwriting Ltd & Ors, and why the shadow cast by Arnold J's reference to the CJEU in Sky v SkyKick clouds the result. [read post]
16 May 2011, 11:52 am
Furthermore, they were clearly expounded seven years ago in two decisions of the House of Lords which was, of course, at that time the highest court in this jurisdiction: Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] 2 AC 457 and Re S (A Child) [2005] 1 AC 593. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 2:35 am
The Courts have since added that the conduct must be ‘oppressive and unreasonable’ (Thomas v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 1233). [read post]
2 May 2007, 6:09 am
In recent years, English law has adapted the action for breach of confidence to provide a remedy for the unauthorized disclosure of personal information: see Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] 2 AC 457. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 4:04 pm
Campbell-James v Guardian Media Group [2005] EWHC 893. [read post]
