Search for: "POUND v. CAMPBELL" Results 81 - 100 of 141
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2016, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Northern Ireland In the case of Elliott v Flanagan [2016] NIQB 8, Stephens J awarded the claimant, Thomas Elliott MP, damages of £48,750 again MLA Phil Flanagan. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 4:24 am by Ben
 Automated Solutions Corporation v. [read post]
7 May 2008, 12:30 am
Nobody would claim that Andy Warhol does not have copyright over his iconic Marilyn portrait, or his Campbell's Soup montages, even if they use other's IP. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
Wings Over Scotland blogger Stuart Campbell took Dugdale to court in a £25,000 defamation action over an article she wrote for the Daily Record accusing him of making homophobic tweets. [read post]
22 May 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Davies doorstepped convicted fraudster Neelam Desai once and sent her two emails over claims she had conned people out of thousands of pounds. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:30 am by INFORRM
  The second is entitled “MGN Limited v. the United Kingdom: Naomi Campbell v. the Tabloid Press” which deals with the relationship between privacy and celebrity. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
Ten years after the publication of an article about Naomi Campbell, the European Court of Human Rights decided that the recovery of success fees from the Mirror would be “disproportionate“, in MGN v United Kingdom (Case No. 39401/04). [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
  We’re not here to debate the reasons why the medical bills are so much larger than actual medical payments (at least when a 500-pound gorilla third-party payor is involved), we’re here to discuss now that affects damages in litigation.As befitting our federal system, with 50 independent state legal systems, the answer to that question is all over the lot. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
It has been revealed in the Press Gazette that the Metropolitan Police has spent more than £40m on investigations into journalism, including £22.8m into Operation Weeting and £14.7m on Operation Elveden. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
There are also a number of resolved cases: A woman v Lancashire Telegraph (Clauses 1, 3, 11/01/2013); A man v The Sun (Clauses 4, 5, 6, 11/01/2013); Mrs Emma Drury-Ward v Chat (Clause 1, 11/01/2013); Ms Tina Hallett & Mr Jonathan Apps v Daily Mail (Clause 1, 11/01/2013); A man v Daily Mail (Clauses 1, 3, 11/01/2013); Sarah Cookv Easy Living, (Clause 3, 11/01/2013); Mr Joe Cooke v The Daily Telegraph (Clause 1, 11/01/2013); Mr Bruce Elliott… [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 4:26 am by INFORRM
There are several other reasons why the decision of the House of Lords in Reynolds v Times Newspapers was aberrant. [read post]
31 May 2012, 7:13 am by Legal Beagle
Detective Chief Superintendent Campbell Thomson said: "Our immediate thoughts are obviously with Arlene's family. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 10:00 pm by Dan Flynn
But with the case of the United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:50 am by INFORRM
The police did not accept liability but has agreed to pay Lewis £30,000 in damages and his £176,000 legal costs, the Lawyer reports here. [read post]
29 May 2010, 4:18 am by INFORRM
Indeed, the damages awarded against them were a paltry £3,500. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 11:58 pm by charonqc
Brown does not have the communication skills of Campbell or Blair. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
It was conceded by the claimant in the Naomi Campbell case that it was in the “public interest” to set the record straight about her false public statements about drug-taking (See Campbell v MGN [2004] 2 AC 457 at [24], [58] and [151]). [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:03 am by INFORRM
The Defendants were ordered to pay Packham £90,000 in damages. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:43 am by Wessen Jazrawi
 European Court of Human Rights: UK must pay Mirror Group over £200k in damages over 2011 Naomi Campbell privacy case. [read post]