Search for: "POWERS v. COMMISSION ON PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE"
Results 1 - 20
of 277
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
The Commission, by fiat, assumed that no defendant was competent enough to defend himself, although the Commission thought that a defendant was competent enough to plead guilty. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 7:14 am
Consequently, even though the sums involved in the measure at issue were not held permanently by the public authorities, the fact that they remained constantly under public control, and therefore available to the competent national authorities, was sufficient for them to be categorised as State resources (see, to that effect, Case C‑83/98 P France v Ladbroke Racing and Commission [2000] ). [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 4:00 am
In Bartos v Scottish Legal Complaints Commission 2015 SC 690, at its own instance the court raised a question as to the proper approach to certain provisions in the Legal Profession and Legal Aid (Scotland) Act 2007 (the Act). [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:02 pm
Ryan, LLC v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 9:11 am
On October 20, 2016, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) and the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) jointly issued their “Antitrust Guidance for Human Resource Professionals. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
The drafting body was known as the Kutak Commission. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 9:11 am
On October 20, 2016, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) and the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) jointly issued their “Antitrust Guidance for Human Resource Professionals. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 4:23 pm
Limits on powers v safeguards The Act is underpinned by the assumption that breadth of powers can be counterbalanced by safeguards (independent prior approval, access restrictions, oversight) and soft limits on their exercise (necessity and proportionality). [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 4:23 pm
In human rights terms that could amount to failure to respect the essence of privacy and freedom of expression: a power that no amount of necessity, proportionality, oversight or safeguarding can legitimise.Limits on powers v safeguardsThe Act is underpinned by the assumption that breadth of powers can be counterbalanced by safeguards (independent prior approval, access restrictions, oversight) and soft limits on their exercise (necessity and proportionality). [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 11:40 pm
In Epic Games v. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 9:30 pm
In North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 7:40 am
Switzer and Davis v. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 4:36 am
The rights of third-country nationals migrating to the EU have largely been constructed under the terms of Part Three, Title V, Chapter 3 TFEU, particularly arts 78-79 thereof. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 9:18 am
First, legislative measures like the DMA, regulatory intervention such as the ongoing DG COMP investigation of the Google Play Store, and litigation (in less than a week, the Ninth Circuit will hear Epic v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:07 am
This wide delegation of power naturally creates concerns about fairness. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 5:53 pm
--Whitman v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am
Defendant contends that the trial court erred by (1) failing to conduct a competency hearing before proceeding with the trial in her absence following her mid-trial ingestion of intoxicants, and (2) amending the judgments to reflect a different date for the commission of the relevant crimes in her absence. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 5:16 am
By 1993, the Supreme Court in Amitai v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 5:05 am
Toward the end of my first post today (on the Epic Games v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 6:21 am
Last week, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
