Search for: "PRATT v. PRATT" Results 41 - 60 of 401
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Rather, said the court, "[t]he board correctly determined that [Police Officer's] injury was not caused by an accident as defined in the New York City Administrative Code and applicable case law.Citing Lichtenstein v Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund of Police Department of City of New York, 57 NY2d 1010, the Appellate Division observed that "not every line-of-duty injury will support an award of accidental disability retirement [and] an injury which occurs without an… [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Rather, said the court, "[t]he board correctly determined that [Police Officer's] injury was not caused by an accident as defined in the New York City Administrative Code and applicable case law.Citing Lichtenstein v Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund of Police Department of City of New York, 57 NY2d 1010, the Appellate Division observed that "not every line-of-duty injury will support an award of accidental disability retirement [and] an injury which occurs without an… [read post]
25 May 2020, 5:17 pm by Peter Mahler
The Company The above-described scenario played out in a lawsuit captioned Magarik v Kraus USA, Inc. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 10:49 pm by Benjamin Beaton
Judge Merritt’s partial dissent located a private right of action in a 1997 Tennessee Court of Appeals decision (Pratt v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 11:08 am by Gordon Ahl
Eric Fick, the program executive officer for the F-35 Lightning II joint program office; Diana Maurer, the director of the defense capabilities and management team at the Government Accountability Office; Gregory Ulmer, the vice president and general manager of the F-35 program at Lockheed Martin; and Matthew Bromberg, the president of the military engines program at Pratt & Whitney. [read post]